Thinking Metacognitively: Metacognitive Skills and Science Performance

The presented study aims to identify the relations between metacognitive skills and science performance. Data were collected from 211 Romanian adolescents in the seventh and eighth grades, who completed the Junior Metacognitive Awareness Inventory (the version for 5th- 9th grades). The results indicate that adolescents generally use metacognitive skills when learning science subjects and that some metacognitive skills are associated with better performance in science. Nevertheless, adolescents seem to encounter difficulties in using diagrams and pictures that facilitate the learning process, in evaluating the outcomes of their learning process and in using different learning strategies, in accordance with specific learning situations. Given the importance of metacognitive skills in science performance, we argue that it is essential for teachers to understand how to develop a culture of metacognition in science classrooms.

REFERENCES:

• Bernacki, M., Aguilar, A. & Byrnes, J. (2011). Self-regulated learning and technology-enhanced learning environments: an opportunity-propensity analysis. In G. Dettori & D. Persico (eds). Fostering self-regulated learning. Learning through ICT (pp. 1 - 26). USA, NY: Information Society Reference.
• Brown, A. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation and other mysterious mechanisms. In E. Weinert & R. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation and understanding (65 - 116). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Coutinho, S., Wiemer-Hastings, K., Skowronski, J & Britt, A. (2005). Metacognition, need for cognition and use of explanations during ongoing learning and problem solving. Learning and Individual Differences, 15, 321 - 337.
• Desoete, A. & Ozsoy, G. (2009). Introduction: metacognition, more than the Loch Ness monster? International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 2 (1), 1 - 6.
• Efklides, A. (2006). Metacognition and affect: what can metacognitive experiences tell us about the learning process? Educational Research Review, 1, 3 - 14.
• Erskine, D. (2009). Effect of Prompted Reflection and Metacognitive Skill Instruction on University Freshmen’s use of Metacognition. Doctoral dissertation: Brigham Young University.
• Flavell, J. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: a new care of cognitive developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906 - 911.
• Gott, S., Lesgold, A., & Kane, R. (1996). Tutoring for transfer of technical competence. In B. Wilson (Ed.), Constructivist Learning Environments: Case Studies in Instructional Design (33 - 48). New Jersey: Educational Technology Publications.
• Gunstone, R. & Northfield, J. (1994). Metacognition and learning to teach. International Journal of Science Education, 16(5), 523 - 537.
• Hartman, H.J. (2001). Teaching metacognitively. In H. Hartman (Ed.), Metacognition in Learning and Instruction: Theory, Research and Practice (pp. 149 - 172). Boston: Kluwer.
• Kruger, J. & Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How differences in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1121 - 1134.
• Lee, C., Teo, T. & Bergin, D. (2009). Children’s use of metacognition in solving everyday problems: an initial study from an Asian context. The Australian Educational Researcher, 36 (3), 89 - 104.
• Mazzoni, G. & Kirsch, I. (2004). Autobiographical memories and beliefs: a preliminary metacognitive model. In B. Schwartz & T. Perfect (eds.), Applied metacognition (121 - 145) (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
• Martini, R. & Shore, B. (2008). Pointing to parallels in ability-related differences in the use of metacognition in academic and psychomotor tasks. Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 237 - 247.
• Nelson, T. & Narens, L. (1990). Metamemory: a theoretical framework and new findings. In G. Bower, (ed.). The psychology of learning and motivation, Volume 26 (125 - 141). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
• Papaleontiou-Luca, E. (2003). The concept and instruction of metacognition. Teacher Development, 7(1), 9 - 30.
• Schwartz, B. & Perfect, T. (2004). Introduction: toward an applied metacognition. In B. Schwartz & T. Perfect (eds.), Applied metacognition (1 - 11) (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
• Shunk, D. & Ertmer, P. (2000). Self-regulation and academic learning: self-efficacy enhancing interventions. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich & M. Zeidner (eds), Handbook of self-regulation (631 - 649). USA: Academic Press.
• Son, L. & Schwartz, B. (2004). The relation between metacognitive monitoring and control. In Schwartz, B. & Perfect, T. (eds.). Applied metacognition (15 - 38), (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
• Spada, M., Georgiou, G. & Wells, A. (2010). The relationship between metacognitions, attentional control and state anxiety. Journal of Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 39 (1), 64 - 71.
• Sperling, R., Howard, B., Miller, L. & Murphy, C. (2002). Measures of children’s knowledge and regulation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 51 - 79.
• Sperling, R., Howard, B., Staley, R. & DuBois, N. (2004). Metacognition and selfregulated learning constructs. Educational Research and Evaluation, 10 (2), 117 - 139.
• Stoeger, H., Ziegler, A. (2011). Self-Regulatory Training through ElementarySchool Students’ Homework Completion. In B.J. Zimmerman and D.H. Shunck (eds). Handbook of Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance (pp. 87 - 102), NY: Routledge.
• Swanson, H. (1990). Influence of metacognitive knowledge and aptitude on problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82 (2), 306 - 314.
• Tobias, S. & Everson, H. (2009). The importance of knowing what you know. A knowledge monitoring framework for studying metacognition in education. In D. Hacker, J. Dunlosky & A. Graesser (eds.). Handbook of Metacognition in Education (pp. 107 - 127). London, UK: Taylor & Francis.
• Zimmerman, B. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45 (1), 166 - 183.
• Zimmerman, B., Bonner, S. & Kovach, R. (1996). Developing self-regulated learners. Beyond achievement to self-efficacy. Washington: American Psychological Association.