Social Media and Task Performance: Does Being Online distract task completion?

At present, social media are connected with education. Both influence daily life and studying since they impact formal and informal relations. This study explores the role of social media in task performance. Based on Mackworth’s clock test, we experimented with university students (N=54), which assessed their capacity to concentrate on the task when exposed to notifications from social networking. We explored whether the appearance of social media notifications regarding different stimulus properties (i.e., sound and vision) lowered cognitive resource capacity to concentrate on the main task. The findings revealed that the mere presence of notifications affected task performance. However, the focal relationship was more complex.

REFERENCES:

• Caird, J. K., Willness, C. R., Steel, P., & Scialfa, C. (2008). A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Cell Phones on Driver Performance. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 40, 1282-1293.
• CBOS. (2020). Internet usage. Research Report. https://www.cbos.pl/SPISKOM.POL/2020/K_085_20.PDF
• Drigas, A., & Karyotaki, M. (2019). Attention and its Role: Theories and Models. International Journal of Emerging Technologies In Learning (IJET), 14, 169-182. DOI:10.3991/ ijet.v14i12.10185
• Gaspelin, N., & Luck, S. J. (2018). The Role of Inhibition in Avoiding Distraction by Salient Stimuli. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22, 79-92. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2017.11.001
• Giambra, L., Quilter, R., Phillips, P. & Hiscock, B. (2013). Performance on a sustained attention task as a function of strategy: A cross-sectional investigation using the Mackworth clock-test. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 26, 333-335. DOI: 10.3758/BF03337673
• Hirsch, P., Koch, I., Karbach, J. (2019). Putting a stereotype to the test: The case of gender differences in multitasking costs in task-switching and dual-task situations. PLoS ONE, 14. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220150
• Isikman, E., MacInnis, D. J., Ülkümen, G., & Cavanaugh, L. A. (2016). The Effects of Curiosity-Evoking Events on Activity Enjoyment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 22, 319-30.
• Lichstein, K. L., Riedel, B. W., & Richman, S. L. (2000). The Mackworth Clock Test: A Computerized Version. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 134, 153-161. DOI: 10.1080/00223980009600858
• Lien, M. C., Ruthruff, E., & Johnston, J. C. (2010). Attentional capture with rapidly changing attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 1-16. DOI: 10.1037/a0015875
• Lodge, J., & Harrison, W. (2019). The Role of Attention in Learning in the Digital Age. The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine, 92, 21-28.
• Mackworth, N. H. (1948). The breakdown of vigilance during prolonged visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1, 6-21, DOI: 10.1080/17470214808416738
• Mantyla, T. (2013). Gender differences in multitasking reflect spatial ability. Psychological Science, 24, 514-520. DOI:10.1177/0956797612459660. PMID: 23462757
• Stoet, G. (2010). PsyToolkit: A software package for programming psychological experiments using Linux. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 1096-1104. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.4.1096
• Stoet, G. (2017). PsyToolkit: A novel web-based method for running online questionnaires and reaction-time experiments. Teaching of Psychology, 44(1), 24-31.
• Statista. (2020). Social Media & User-Generated Content. https://www.statista.com/statistics/272014/global-social-networks-ranked-by-number-of-users/
• Wickens, C. (2021). Attention: Theory, Principles, Models and Applications, International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 37, 403-417. DOI: 10.1080/104 47318.2021.1874741
• Wingenfeld, K., Bullig, R., Mensebach, C., Hartje, W., Driessen, M., & Beblo, T. (2006). Attention bias towards personally relevant stimuli: the individual emotional Stroop task. Psychological Reports, 99, 781-793. DOI:10.2466/pr0.99.3.781-793. PMID: 17305196.