Digital Exclusion in Poland and South Korea - A Comparative Analysis of the Phenomenon

  • Author: Stanisław Juszczyk
  • Institution: University of Silesia
  • ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7775-6303
  • Author: Suwan Kim
  • Institution: Hankook University of Foreign Studies, Seoul
  • ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6062-5008
  • Year of publication: 2022
  • Source: Show
  • Pages: 32-47
  • DOI Address: https://doi.org/10.15804/tner.22.68.2.02
  • PDF: tner/202202/tner6802.pdf

Comparative empirical studies of digital exclusion have been conducted in Poland and South Korea. Surveys of students (including doctoral candidates) and in-depth interviews with academic teachers at selected universities and fields of study were used (N=135). The average differences in the opinions of Polish and Korean students are not statistically significant at the level of p

REFERENCES:

  • Brown, R., & Whittle, R. (2020). Algorithms, blockchains, cryptocurrency: Implications for the Future of the Workplace. Emerald Publishing Limited.
  • Chen, W. (2013). The implications of social for the digital divides in America. The Information Society, 29, 13-25.
  • Corrocher, N., & Ordanini, A. (2002). Measuring the digital divide: a framework for the analysis of cross-country differences. J. Information Technology, 17, 9-19.
  • Gunkel, D. J. (2003). Second Thoughts: Toward a Critique of the Digital Divide. New Media and Society, 5(4), 499-522.
  • Han-Wei, Liu, Ching-Fu Lin, & Yu-Jie, Chen. (2019). Beyond State v. Loomis: Artificial Intelligence, Government Algorithmization, and Accountability. International Journal of Law and Information Technology. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3313916
  • Helmond, A. (2013, November 16). The Algorithmization of the Hyperlink. Computational Culture, 3.
  • Helsper, E. J. (2012). A corresponding fields model of digital inclusion. Communication Theory, 22(4), 403-426. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2012.01416.x
  • Helsper, E. J. (2017). The social relativity of Digital exclusion: applying relative deprivation theory to Digital inequalities. Communication Theory. DOI: 10.111/comt.12110
  • Janmaat, J. G. (2013). Subjective Inequality: A Review of International Comparative Studies on People’s Views about Inequality. European Journal of Sociology, 54(3), 357-389. DOI: 10.1017/S0003975613000209
  • Miczka, T. (2019). Specifics of Algorithmization in Data Culture. European Journal of Engineering and Formal Sciences, 3(3), 13-21.
  • Juszczyk, S., & Kim, S. (2020). Distance Learning in the Polish and Korean Universities During COVID-19 Pandemic. The New Educational Review, 62(4), 115-127. DOI: 10.15804/tner.2020.62.4.10
  • OECD. (2011). Understanding the digital divide, OECD Digital Economy Papers, 49. OECD Publishing.
  • Picciano, A. G. (2004). Educational Research Primer. Continuum.
  • Pick, J., & Sarkar, A. (2016). Theories of the Digital Divide: Critical comparison. 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Conference Proceedings Vol. 1, 3888-3897. DOI:10.1109/HICSS.2016.484
  • Reisdorf, B., & Groselij, D. (2015). Internet (Non-)Use types and motivational access: Implications for digital inequalities research. New Media & Society, 1-20. DOI: 10.1177/1461444815621539
  • Robinson, L., Cotton, S. R., Ono, H., Quan-Haase, A., Mesch, G., Chen, W., Schulz, J., Hale, T. M., & Stern, M. J. (2015). Digital inequalities and why they matter. Information Communication & Society, 18(5), 569-582. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2015.10112532
  • Ruggiero, T. E. (2000). Uses and Gratifications Theory in the 21st Century. MASS COMMUNICATION & SOCIETY, 3(1), 3-37.
  • Schuilenberg, M., & Peeters, R. (Eds.). (2022). The Algorithmic Society: Technology, Power, and Knowledge. Routledge.
  • Skaletsky, M., Soremekun, O., & Galliers, R. D. (2014). The Changing - and Unchanging - Face of the Digital Divide: An Application of Kohonen Self-organizing Maps. Information Technology for Development, 29(3), 218-250.
  • Śmiałowski, T. (2019). Assessment of digital exclusion of Polish Households. Quantitative Methods in Economics, XX(1), 54-61.
  • Van Deursen, A. J. A. M., & Helsper, E. J. (2015). The Third-Level Digital Divide: Who Benefits Most from Being Online? In L. Robinson, S. R. Cotten, J. Schulz, T. M. Hale, & A. Williams (Eds.), Communication and Information Technologies Annual (Studies in Media and Communications), 10, 29-52. DOI: 10.1108/S2050-206020150000010002
  • Van Deursen, A. J. A. M., & Van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2015). A Multifaceted Model of Internet Access to Understand Digital Divides: An Empirical Investigation. The Information Society, 31(4). DOI: 10.1080/01972243.2015.1069770
  • Van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2005). The deepening divide: Inequality in the Information Society. Sage.
  • Van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2006). Digital divide research: achievements and shortcomings. Poetics, 34(4-5), 221-235.
  • Van Dijk, J. A. G. M., & Van Deursen, A. J. A. M. (2014). Digital Skills. Unlocking the Information Society. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1057/9781137437037
  • Warschauer, M. (2003). Technology and Social Inclusion: Rethinking the Digital Divide. MIT Press.

algorithmization of social life digital exclusion post-digital society South Korea Poland

Message to:

 

 

© 2017 Adam Marszałek Publishing House. All rights reserved.

Projekt i wykonanie Pollyart