Abduction in Teaching: Results of a Qualitative Research

Author: Kálmán Sántha
Institution: Kodolányi János University, Székesfehérvár, Hungary
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1983-9255
Author: Edit Gyeszli
Institution: Nemesszalók Elementary School, Nemesszalók, Hungary
Year of publication: 2022
Source: Show
Pages: 173-185
DOI Address: https://doi.org/10.15804/tner.
PDF: tner/202202/tner6814.pdf

The paper discovers the presence of abduction in teachers’ activities and emphasises the role of trichotomous systems (abduction, deduction, induction) in discovering human reality. The paper focuses on the presence of abduction in education sciences research, and its main goal is to detect abduction in teaching activities and classroom interaction. Abduction is a type of reasoning requiring philosophical, logical, and psychological background, distinct from induction and deduction, and it contributes to a viewpoint in social research that strives to make research in human reality easier to understand. The qualitative study involved explores the presence of abduction in teachers’ communication based on unstructured observation. The observation was carried out in a primary school. The objects of observation were the Geography, Art, and PE classes of the same teacher. The data of the class observation were recorded verbatim. The records were processed using an inductive, data-driven method after the classes. The reliability of the process was ensured by intracoding. The results of the observations reflect the presence of abduction in classroom interaction. The results showed that abduction appeared in the Geography, Art, and PE classes observed, and every class witnessed right and wrong abductive conclusions. The paper is relevant to anybody interested in the appearance of abduction in education sciences research and aims at completing the arsenal of tools available for analysing teachers’ activities.


  • Balázs, G. (2008). Az abdukció a modern nyelvtudományban, valamint igazolása Mikszáth Kálmán Új Zrínyiász-ában (Abduction in modern linguistics and its justification in Mikszáth Kálmán’s Új Zrínyiász). In G. Balázs, & H. Varga, (Eds.), Abdukció. Az abdukció logikája, szemiotikája (The logic and semiotics of abduction) (pp. 38-52). Magyar Szemiotikai Társaság, Líceum Kiadó.
  • Bellucci, F. (2018). Eco and Peirce on Abduction. European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy, X(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.4000/ejpap.1122
  • Budiastra, A. A. K., Erlina, N., & Wicaksono, I. (2019). Video-based Interaction through Teacher Working Group Forum to Increase Elementary School Teachers’ Professionalism. The New Educational Review, 57(3), 187-199. DOI: 10.15804/tner.2019.57.3.15
  • Graneheim, U., Lindgren, B.-M., & Lundman, B. (2017). Methodological challenges in qualitative content analysis: A discussion paper. Nurse Education Today, 56(9), 29-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.06.002
  • Gyeszli, E., & Sántha, K. (2015). Abdukció az osztálytermi interakcióban (Abduction in classroom interaction). Iskolakultúra, 25(12), 19-27. https://doi.org/10.17543/ISKKULT.2015.12.19
  • Flick, U. (2014). An Introduction to Qualitative Research. Sage.
  • Kelle, U. (2002). Abduktion und Interpretation. Die Bedeutung einer „Logik der Entdeckung” für die Hermeneutische Sozialforschung (Abduction and Interpretation. The Importance of a “Logic of Discovery” for Hermeneutic Social Research). In H.-G. Ziebertz, S. Heil, & A. Prokopf (Eds.), Abduktive Korrelation. Religionspädagogische Konzeption, Methodologie und Professionalität in interdisziplinärem Dialog (Abductive Correlation. Religious education conception, methodology and professionalism in interdisciplinary dialogue) (pp. 111-126). LIT Verlag.
  • Kessels, J., & Korthagen, F. (1996). The relationship between theory and practice. Back to the classics. Educational Researcher, 25(3), 17-22. DOI: 10.310 2/0013189X025003017
  • Kuckartz, U. (2014). Mixed Methods. Methodologie, Forschungsdesign und Analyseverfahren (Mixed Methods. Methodology, research design and analytical procedures). Springer.
  • Kuckartz, U. (2019). Qualitative Text Analysis: A Systematic Approach. In G. Kaiser & N. Presmeg (Eds.), Compendium for Early Career Researchers in Mathematics Education. (pp. 181-197). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15636-7_8
  • Malterud, K., Siersma, V. D., & Guassora, A. D. (2016). Sample size in qualitative interview studies: guided by information power. Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1753-1760.
  • Marshall, B., Cardon, P., Poddar, A., & Fontenot, R. (2013). Does Sample Size Matter in Qualitative Research? A Review of Qualitative Interviews in Research. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 54(1), 11-22. DOI: 10.1080/08874417.2013.11645667
  • Messmer, R. (2015). Stimulated Recall as a Focussed Approach to Action and Thought Processes of Teachers. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum Qualitative Social Research, 16(1). http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs150130
  • Meyer, M. (2009). Abduktion, Induktion - Konfusion. Bemerkungen zur Logik der interpretativen Sozialforschung (Abduction, Induction - Confusion. Remarks on the logic of interpretative social research). Zeitschriftfür Erziehungswissenschaft, 12(2), 302-320. DOI: 10.1007/s11618-009-0067-1
  • Peirce, C. S. (1992). The Essential Peirce. Selected Philosophical Writings. Houser-Kloesel.
  • Petőfi, S. J. (2008). Az abdukció szerepe a „face to face” kommunikációban és a szöveginterpretációban (The role of abduction in „face to face” communication and text interpretation). In G. Balázs & H. Varga (Eds.), Abdukció. Az abdukció logikája, szemiotikája (The logic and semiotics of abduction) (pp. 15-20). Magyar Szemiotikai Társaság, Líceum Kiadó.
  • Reichertz, J. (2003). Die Abduktion in der qualitativen Sozialforschung (Abduction in qualitative social research). Leske-Budrich.
  • Reichertz, J. (2009). Abduction: The Logic of Discovery of Grounded Theory. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum Qualitative Social Research, 11(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/fqs-11.1.1412
  • Reichertz, J. (2013). Abduktion, Deduktion und Induktion in der qualitativen Sozialforschung (Abduction, Deduction and Induction in Qualitative Social Research). In U. Flick, E. von Kardoff, & I. Steinke (Eds.), Qualitative Forschung. Ein Handbuch (Qualitative Research. A handbook) (pp. 276-287). Rowohlt Verlag.
  • Ruin, S. (2019). Kategorien als Ausdruck einer ausgewiesenen Beobachter_innenperspektive? Ein Vorschlag für eine qualitativere qualitative Inhaltsanalyse (Categories as an Expression of an Identified Observer Perspective? A Constructive Proposal for a more Qualitative Qualitative Content Analysis). Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum Qualitative Social Research, 20(3). http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/fqs-20.3.3395
  • Sántha, K. (2013). Stimulated Recall in exploring the constraints of reflective thinking. Problems of Psychology in the 21st Century, 6(3), 47-54.
  • Tavory, I., & Timmermans, S. (2014). Abductive analysis: Theorizing qualitative research. The University of Chicago Press.
  • Vassinen, A. (2012). Configurational Explanation of Marketing Outcomes. A Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis Approach. Aalto University. https://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/bitstream/handle/123456789/11558/Aalto_DD_2012_039.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  • Wirth, U. (2000). Welt als Zeichen und Hypothese (World as sign and hypothesis). Suhrkamp.
  • Zeichner, K., & Liston, D. (1996). Reflective Teaching. An Introduction. Erlbaum.
  • Želinský, D. (2019). From Deduction to Abduction: Constructing a Coding Frame for Communist Secret Police Documents. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum Qualitative Social Research, 20(3). http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/fqs-20.3.3377

abduction classroom interaction unstructured observation qualitative research

Message to:



© 2017 Adam Marszałek Publishing House. All rights reserved.

Projekt i wykonanie Pollyart