Civic Education for Democracy During Crisis : Measuring State Media Engagement

Informed by a research problem of explaining the relationships between the specificity of civic education and public support for authoritarian politicians, this paper aims to propose and test an analytical tool for measuring media engagement in civic education. It contributes methodologically to studies on civic education by delivering a tool that applies to identify and trace state media’s efforts to shape either democratic or autocratic citizenship models. Thereby, it allows monitoring current challenges to civic education for democracy in individual countries. The test contributes empirically to the studies on state-orchestrated civic education by revealing civic education for autocracy in pandemic-driven Poland. It enriches the knowledge of the use of Polish state media by the anti-democratic ruling actors to maintain the status quo.

REFERENCES:

• Bochsler, D., & Juon, A. (2020). Authoritarian Footprints in Central and Eastern Europe. East European Politics, 36(2), 167–187. DOI: 10.1080/21599165.2019.1698420
• Dimitrov, G. (2011). State-Orchestrated Civic Education Versus Civic Competences of School Students: Some Conceptual Implications from a National Case Study. Journal of Social Science Education, 10(4), 12–21.
• Doğanay, A. (2012). A Curriculum Framework for Active Democratic Citizenship Education. In M. Print, & D. Lange (Eds.), Schools, Curriculum and Civic Education for Building Democratic Citizens (pp. 19–39). SensePublishers.
• Fratczak-Rudnicka, B., & Torney-Purta, J. (2003). Competencies for Civic and Political Life in a Democracy. In D. S. Rychen, L. H. Salganik, & M. E. McLaughlin (Eds.), Contributions to the Second DeSeCo Symposium (Vol. 71). Swiss Federal Statistical Office.
• Galston, W. A. (2004). Civic Education and Political Participation. Political Science and Politics, 37(2), 263–266. DOI: 10.1017/s1049096504004202
• Gerschewski, J. (2013). The Three Pillars of Stability: Legitimation, Repression, and Co-optation in Autocratic regimes. Democratisation, 20(1), 13–38. DOI: 10.1080/ 13510347.2013.738860.
• Kreuder-Sonnen, C. (2018). An Authoritarian Turn in Europe and European Studies? Journal of European Public Policy, 25(3), 452–464. DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2017.1411383
• Lührmann, A. (2021). Disrupting the Autocratization Sequence: Towards Democratic Resilience. Democratisation, 28(5), 1017–1039. DOI: 10.1080/13510347.2021.1928080
• Petrova, T., & Pospieszna, P. (2021). Democracy Promotion in Times of Autocratization: The Case of Poland, 1989–2019. Post-Soviet Affairs, 37(6), 526–543. DOI: 10.1080/1060586X.2021.1975443
• Rak, J. (2021). Framing Enemies by the State Television: Delegitimisation of Anti-Government Protest Participants During the First Wave of the Pandemic in Poland. Journal of Contemporary Central and Eastern Europe, 29(2-3), 157–175. DOI: 10.1080/25739638.2021.2007601
• Rak, J., & Bäcker, R. (Eds.). (2022). Neo-Militant Democracies in Post-Communist Member States of the European Union. Routledge.
• Rezmer-Płotka, K. (2020). The Effects of Crises in the European Union as a Manifestation of the Militant Democracy Rule Implementation. Przegląd Prawa Konstytucyjnego 6(58), 615–621.
• Rezmer-Płotka, K. (2021). Contentious Politics in Defense of Neo-Militant Democracy in Poland: The Rationale Behind Fighting a Quasi-Militant Democracy. HAPSc Policy Briefs Series, 2(1), 24–29.
• Tannenberg, M., Bernhard, M., Gerschewski, J., Lührmann, A., & von Soest, C. (2021). Claiming the Right to Rule: Regime Legitimation Strategies from 1900 to 2019. European Political Science Review, 13(1), 77–94. DOI: 10.1017/S1755773920000363