Consequences of National Testing of Primary School Pupils Through the Eyes of Teachers

The study deals with the consequences of national testing at the primary school level on the processes of education, teachers’ work in the classroom and the teaching profession. It is based on the international discourse about the consequences of large-scale testing and investigates Slovak teachers’ opinions and measures they have implemented under the influence of testing in their own instruction and school. The research, carried out by the questionnaire method on a sample of 786 (2017) and 940 (2020) respondents, confirms that teachers perceive national testing as too far from instruction and inconsistent with educational standards. They do not believe it can fulfil the set goals, but, on the other hand, because of it, they narrow down instruction to prepare for tests and take measures that do not change the quality of pupil learning.

REFERENCES:

• Bond, L. (2020). Assessment in the Service of Student Learning: Three Cases in Point. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 39(3), 86–89. DOI: 10.1111/emip.12373
• Brozmanová, M., & Kocisová, L. (2021). Hodnotenie kvality primárneho vzdelávania Testovaním 5 z pohľadu učiteľov [Evaluation of the Quality of Primary Education by Testing 5 from the Teachers’ Perspective]. Slavonic Pedagogical Studies Journal, 10(1), 1–16. DOI: 10.18355/PG.2021.10.1.1
• Davis, D. S., & Vehabovic, N. (2017). The Dangers of Test Preparation: What Students Learn (and Don’t Learn) About Reading Comprehension from Test-Centric Literacy Instruction. The Reading Teacher, 71(5), 579–588. DOI: 10.1002/trtr.1641
• Heritage, M. (2018) Making Assessment Work for Teachers. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 37(1), 39–41. DOI: 10.1111/emip.12191
• Konarzewski, K. (2019). Primary School Pupils’ Attitude toward Mathematics and their Achievement in Mathematics. The New Educational Review, 56(2), 17–28. DOI: 10.15804/tner.2019.56.2.01
• Marion, S. F. (2018). The Opportunities and Challenges of a Systems Approach to Assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 37(1), 45–48. DOI: 10.1111/ emip.12193
• National Testing of Pupils in Europe: Objectives, Organisation and Use of Results. (2009). EACEA P9 Eurydice. Noble, T., Suarez, C., Rosebery, A., O’Connor, M. C., Warren, B., & Hudicourt-Barnes, J. (2012). “I Never Thought of it as Freezing”: How Students Answer Questions on LargeScale Science Tests and What They Know about Science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 49(6), 778–803. DOI: 10.1002/tea.21026
• Popham, W. J. (1999). Where Large Scale Educational Assessment is Heading and Why it shouldn’t. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 18(3), 4–35.
• Shepard L. A., Penuel W. R., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2018a). Classroom Assessment Principles to Support Learning and Avoid the Harms of Testing. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 37(1), 52–57. DOI: 10.1111/emip.12195
• Shepard L. A., Penuel W. R., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2018b). Using Learning and Motivation Theories to Coherently Link Formative Assessment, Grading Practices, and Large-Scale Assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 37(1), 21–34. DOI: 10.1111/ emip.12189
• Sicoly, F. (2002). What Do School-level Scores from Large-Scale Assessments Really Measure? Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2(4), 17–26.
• Sigþórsson, R. (2017). Testing or transforming practice: probing an Icelandic national initiative to improve literacy education. Literacy, 51(2), 65–73. DOI: 10.1111/lit.12107
• Simpson, A. (2017). Teachers negotiating professional agency through literature-based assessment. Literacy, 51(2), 111–119. DOI: 10.1111/lit.12114
• Testovanie 5. (n.d.). NÚCEM Národný ústav certifikovaných meraní. [Testing 5. National Institute for Certified Educational Measurements]. https://www.nucem.sk/sk/merania/narodne-merania/testovanie-5/o-testovani-5
• The Guardian. (2014). OECD and PISA Tests are Damaging Education Worldwide. https://theguardian.com/education/2014/may/06/oecdpisa-tests-damaging-education-academics
• Volante, L., DeLuca, L., Adie, L., Baker, E., Harju-Loukkainen, H., Heritage, M., Schneider, Ch., Stobart, G., Tan, K., & Wyatt-Smith, C. (2020). Synergy and Tension between LargeScale and Classroom Assessment: International Trends. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 39(4), 21–29. DOI: 10.1111/emip.12382
• Wilson, M. (2018). Making Measurement Important for Education: The Crucial Role of Classroom Assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 37(1), 5–20. DOI: 10.1111/emip.12188