Use of Interactive Methods in Distance Education: Current Challenges and Realities

  • Author: Kateryna Fomin
  • Institution: Associate Professor Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University
  • ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6005-7357
  • Author: Olena Budnyk
  • Institution: Professor Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University
  • ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5764-6748
  • Author: Alexander Chinchoy
  • Institution: Associate Professor Volodymyr Vynnychenko Central Ukrainian State Pedagogical University
  • ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2572-1416
  • Author: Mariіa Klepar
  • Institution: Professor Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University
  • ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7715-7928
  • Year of publication: 2022
  • Source: Show
  • Pages: 13-21
  • DOI Address: https://doi.org/10.15804/ve.2022.01.01
  • PDF: ve/1/ve101.pdf

The article substantiates the relevance of the problem of implementation of interactive teaching methods in the process of future teacher’s distance (mixed) training in higher education institutions. The theoretical aspects of the outlined problem are covered through the analysis of the content of the main concepts: interactive technologies, dialogue, educational dialogue, distance education, etc. Considerable attention is paid to the presentation of the philosophical and didactic principles of future teacher training to use interactive technologies (in particular, the principles of humanism, anthropological perspective, nature conformity, educational feedback interaction, pedagogical optimism, scientific organisation of the educational dialogue, the communicative orientation of teaching, speech ethics, modelling problem situations in education. Some types of interactive learning are presented and recommended for working with students in teaching socio-humanitarian, natural science, and math disciplines. The necessity to develop future teachers’ communicative activity, critical thinking, and team interaction to conduct constructive dialogues, considering the realities of online and offline learning, is emphasised.

REFERENCES:

  • Berteau, M.-C., & Tures, A. (2019). Becoming profes­sional through dialogical learning: How language activity shapes and (re-) organises the dialogical self ’s voicings and positions. Learning, Culture, and Social Interaction, 20, 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2017.10.005
  • Budnyk, O., & Vasianovych, H. (2017). The Category of freedom in the written heritage of John Amos Comenius and Hryhoriy Skovoroda. Advanced Ed­ucation, 7, 85–89. DOI: 10.20535/2410-8286.93517
  • Budnyk, O., Matveieva, N., Fomin, K., Nazarenko, T., & Kalabska, V. (2021). Preparation of future teachers for the introduction of digital innovation in a rural school: problems and prospects. Revista Brasileira De Educação Do Campo, 6, e13124. http://dx.doi.org/10.20873/uft.rbec.e13124
  • Budnyk, O., Mazur, P., Matsuk, L., Berezovska, L., & Vovk, O. (2021). Development of professional cre­ativity of future teachers (Based on comparative research in Ukraine and Poland). Amazonia Inves­tiga, 10(44), 9–17. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2021.44.08.1
  • Busel, V. T. (2002). Large interpretive dictionary of the modern Ukrainian language. VTF «Perun».
  • Bykov, V. Yu. (2011). Technologies of Cloud Comput­ing – the Leading Information Technologies for the Further Development of Informatization of the Education System of Ukraine. Computer in School and Family, 6, 3–11.
  • Cahoon, A., McGill, S., & Simms, V. (2021). Under­standing home education in the context of COVID-19 lockdown. Irish Educational Studies, 2021(40), 443–455. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2021.1921010
  • Candil, D. M., Verdugo, E. R. B., Davila, C. J. B., & Ver­dugo, A. A. G. (2021). Higher education and pan­demic: a pilot study of educational experience during a pandemic questionnaire. Revista Digital De In­vestigacion En Docencia Universitaria-Ridu, 15. https://doi.org/10.19083/10.19083/ridu.2021.1347
  • Comenius, J.A. (1940). The great didactic. In A.A. Kras­novskiy (Ed.), Selected pedagogical works. Vol. 1. Radianska shkola.
  • Comenius, J. A. (1982). Fortius Redivivus. Vol. 2. Ped­agogika.
  • Dychkivska, I. M. (2004). Innovative pedagogical tech­nologies. Akademvydav.
  • Ferrari, A. (2012). Digital Competence in Practice: An Analysis of Frameworks. Luxembourg. Publications Office of the European Union. DOI: 10.2791/82116.
  • Fomin, K., & Budnyk, O. (2020). Interaction of sub­jects of the Educational Process of Primary School: results of experimental research. Scientific Bulletin of Chełm. Section of Pedagogy, 1, 29–39.
  • Fomin, K., Budnyk, O., Matsuk, L., Mykhalchuk, O., Kuzenko, O., Sirenko, A., & Zakharasevych, N. (2020). Dynamics of Future Teachers’ Cognitive Readiness Development to Organise Students’ Di­alogic Learning. Revista Inclusiones, 7, 276–288.
  • Harris, N. & Welch Bacon, C. E. (2019). Developing Cognitive Skills Through Active Learning: A Sys­tematic Review of Health Care Professions. Athletic Training Education Journal, 14(2), 135–148. https://doi.org/10.4085/1402135
  • Kondrashov, M.M. (2019). A dialogic approach to ed­ucation as a means of quality training of future spe­cialists for professional activity. Scientific Bulletin of the Flight Academy. Pedagogical Sciences, 5, 357– –362.
  • Liu, B., Tür, G., Hakkani-Tür, D., Shah, P., & Heck, L. (2018). Dialogue Learning with Human Teach­ing and Feedback in End-to-End Trainable Task-Oriented Dialogue Systems. Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, New Orleans, Louisiana, 1, 2060–2069. DOI: 10.18653/v1/N18-1187.
  • Montaigne, M. (1991). Experiments. Nauka.
  • Nieduziak, E. (2022). Teachers in Distance Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Context of Main­stream, Inclusive and Special Education. International Journal of Research in E-Learning, 8(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.31261/IJREL.2022.8.1.05
  • Norlin, B. (2020). Comenius, moral and pious educa­tion, and the why, when, and how of school disci­pline. History of Education, 49(3), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/0046760X.2020.1739759
  • Peterson, S. (2011). Socrates and Philosophy in the Dialogues of Plato. Cambridge University Press.
  • Pometun, O. I., & Pyrozhenko, A. V. (Eds.) (2004). A modern lesson. Interactive learning technologies: a scientific and methodological manual.
  • Rembierz, M. (2020). Hope – humanity – society: questions concerning hope and the inspirations of critical realism. In K. Wielecki, & K. Śledzińska (Eds.), The Relational Theory of Society. “Archerian Studies”, 2 (pp. 159–176). Peter Lang.
  • Rembierz, M. (2021). Revaluations of the times of pandemics: on the interference of the pandemic in the world of human values. Transformacje, 3, 132–146.
  • Sajdak-Burska, A. (2018). Humanistic paradigm in ac­ademic didactics – utopia, necessity, opportunity? Pedagogika Szkoły Wyższej, 22, 13–26. DOI: 10.18 276/psw.2017.2-01
  • Trokhymenko, V. (2004). Distance education of teach­ing staff: experience and problems. Postgraduate education in Ukraine.
  • Tsependa, I., & Budnyk, O. (2021). Editorial. Mission and strategy of modern university development in the conditions of digitalisation. Amazonia Investi­ga, 10(41), 6–9. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2021.41.05.0
  • Ushinsky, K. D. (1983). Theoretical problems of pedago­gy. Vol. 1. Radianska shkola.
  • Vasianovych, H. (2013). Methodological contexts of pedagogical science at the current stage of its de­velopment. Pedagogy and psychology of professional education, 3, 9–30. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Pip­po_2013_3_3.

dialogic learning interactive learning technologies distance education higher education institution teacher training

Message to:

 

 

© 2017 Adam Marszałek Publishing House. All rights reserved.

Projekt i wykonanie Pollyart