- Author:
Wiesław Wacławczyk
- Institution:
Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń (Poland)
- Year of publication:
2006
- Source:
Show
- Pages:
7-15
- DOI Address:
http://dx.doi.org/10.15804/ppsy2006001
- PDF:
ppsy/35/ppsy2006001.pdf
One can hardly overestimate the meaning of freedom of speech in the European tradition. It dates back to the times of the ancient Greece, although it was only John Milton who wrote the first tract devoted to the subject in question. In his Areopagitica (1644), Milton skillfully defended the principle of a free flow of ideas by stressing out that an open and undisturbed clash of various information and opinions is a condition of discovering truth in life. The best-known and most frequently quoted fragment of Areopagitica reads: “And though all the winds of doctrine were let loose to play upon the earth, so Truth be in the ! eld, we do injuriously, by licencing and prohibiting to misdoubt her strength. Let her and Falsehood grapple; who ever knew Truth put to the wors, in a free and open encounter. Her confuting is the best and surest suppressing”.
- Author:
Anna Hadała-Skóra
- E-mail:
annahadalaskoraur@gmail.com
- Institution:
University of Rzeszów
- ORCID:
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6432-5651
- Year of publication:
2020
- Source:
Show
- Pages:
583-590
- DOI Address:
https://doi.org/10.15804/ppk.2020.06.47
- PDF:
ppk/58/ppk5847.pdf
This article is devoted to the impeachment procedure in the United States of America. The first part of the article outlines a short historical background on the subject. In the following part, the impeachment procedure is characterized in its current form, with particular emphasis placed on the role of the House of Representatives and Senate of the United States of America. The data concerning the processes that took place in the Senate as a result of the impeachment procedure are also indicated.
- Author:
Anna Hadała-Skóra
- E-mail:
annahadalaskora@ur.edu.pl
- Institution:
Uniwersytet Rzeszowski
- ORCID:
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6432-5651
- Year of publication:
2021
- Source:
Show
- Pages:
427-435
- DOI Address:
https://doi.org/10.15804/ppk.2021.04.28
- PDF:
ppk/62/ppk6228.pdf
The political position of the chairman on the example of the houses of the Congress of the United States of America
This article is devoted entirely to the institution of the President on the example of the Congress of the United States of America. The office of the chairman, whose competence is to conduct deliberations, is characteristic of bodies with a collegial structure. This applies especially to those of them whose composition consists of more than a few persons. The author of the article focus on all aspects concerning this office. In the first part there is a brief characterization of the models of the institution of the speaker of parliament, as well as a historical outline of this institution. In the next part an author present the systemic position of the presiding officers of the chambers of the American Parliament.
- Author:
Ewelina Waśko-Owsiejczuk
- Institution:
University of Białystok
- ORCID:
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9021-3100
- Year of publication:
2023
- Source:
Show
- Pages:
114-140
- DOI Address:
https://doi.org/10.15804/athena.2023.79.06
- PDF:
apsp/79/apsp7906.pdf
The research purpose of the paper is to analyze the key assumptions outlined in the US National Security Strategy 2022. The paper will look for answers to the following questions: What is national security strategy? Is it an important document? What and for whom does it matter? What direction will US policy take under Joe Biden’s administration? What tools and methods will be used? What are the goals and priorities set in the document? Which countries are among the closest allies and biggest adversaries? What impact had the Russian aggression against Ukraine on the shape of the US National Security Strategy 2022? The main research method will be source analysis and criticism, as well as a comparative method to contrast the current NSS with previous ones. The research thesis assumes that the priority of the current US security strategy remains the one initiated during previous White House administrations – the rivalry with China, which in tandem with Russia aims to change the modern international order, threatening the national interests of the United States of America. The conducted analysis, on the one hand, confirms the thesis, and, on the other hand, points to inconsistencies in US strategic thinking (which takes the form of a “wish list”), which can significantly affect the effectiveness of the implementation of the set goals and objectives.