In the paper, its author aims to show the degree to which the influence of just a single person, Stefan Estreicher, shaped the earliest knowledge of a student, fresh science graduate and young PhD at the Jagiellonian University, Bronisław Malinowski; the influence of a man that Malinowski deemed to be his master, “his professor”, and, with time, his good friend. We quote Stanisław Estreicher’s most important thoughts, which were often common truths of his times and, to an even higher extent, of the intellectual circles he belonged to. They later appeared in Bronisław Malinowski’s works, often in their edited versions or as specific “reference points” in the issues he addressed.

In the questions concentrated with "ethos" the were issued opinions from as well the bio-neurological side as the humanistic one resulted of the antropoic rules. In this paper trials of putting together there two approaches: the first presented by W. Tulibacki "Bioethics and Naturalism" and the second one by T. Teller "lngenesis Conception and Cannon of the Beauty”. The human dignity created by the own self-criticism of ”deep ego” starts the process of transparence (lin Heidegger's tern) of the ethics and ends in the C. McGinn's cause - effects consciousness. 

The aim of the article is to define the methodological status of the proposed new sub-discipline of political sciences – the political science of religion (politology of religion). The diagram of naturalism adopted in the text indicates the choice of the perspective of cognition for an alliance of religions and politics as a single social and political phenomenon. The position expressed in the text aims to find a common knowledge base for the two most important social phenomena. The presented postulate takes into account the combination of knowledge in the field of political sciences and theology, sociology of religion, religiousness or history with the classical methodology of sciences, characteristic for mathematical natural science.