Awarding the Renumeration to a Professional Attorney for Preparing an Opinion on the Grounds of a Complaint to an Administrative Court

This article is focused on ethical and legal aspects of remuneration for work performed by the attorney established under the right to assistance in the court-administrative proceedings. The attorney established under the right to assistance is obliged to prepare a pleading enabling the party to initiate court proceedings. The legislator did not foresee the possibility for an attorney established under the right to assistance to draw up an opinion on the lack of grounds to lodge a complaint. In its teaching the Church emphasizes the ethical dimension of work. It concerns both the performance of work and the payment for its completion. Every job should be performed with due diligence and integrity. It is necessary that the payment for the work done should be fair and adequate. It is unacceptable that the performed job remains unpaid for. Similarly, the employee cannot demand remuneration if he either failed to do the job or did not meet the required standards. The ethical dimension comprises the responsibility for the jobs undertaken by employees. The aim of the article is to try to Combie two scientific Fields to show that both the legal and ethical Fields have the same rulet described in different scientific languages. The autors hope that the issues raised will significantly contribute to under standing what remuneration is for the work done, as well as the fact that in the ethical and legal field this type ob. Behavior is unacceptable. Both the law and social teaching of the Catholic Church consider such attitudes to be reprehensible.