The subject of the article is the analysis of the provisions of the Art. 35 (2) of the Act on Local Referendum against the background of the Art. 31 (3) of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland, creating the conditions for admissibility of formulating restrictions on the use of constitutionally specified provisions the rights and freedoms of the individual. The aim of the study is to determine whether the statutory regulation under review remains compliant with the constitutional principle of proportionality regarding the citizen’s right to a court. The main thesis is that the disposition of the Art. 35 (2) of the Local Referendum Act does not infringe the individual’s rights related to the pursuit of claims related to unreliable referendum campaigns.

We present the institution of a local referendum from a comparative perspective on the example of legal regulations in Ukraine and Poland. The study is the result of the ongoing research of the two Authors and is of crucial importance in the current political situation – the Russian aggression against Ukraine. Hence, it is relevant both nationally, Europe-wide and internationally. The analysis includes a legal comparative analysis of institutions and an attempt to assess their effectiveness. The authors point out that there is a need for effective ‘safeguarding’ in Ukraine to prevent the referendum from being used as a political instrument (at hoc), against the will of the people. The analysis uses a dogmatic and comparative legal method and draws on the authors’ experience of holding local referendums. This research may be useful not only for the researchers of the local government law but also for the legislators.

Problems of the Legal Structure of the Participatory Budgeting

The article subjected the regulation of the participatory budget to a critical analysis as internally contradictory and controversial (including constitutional doubts). It pointed out some resulting paradoxes and discrepancies between practice and jurisprudence in fundamental issues: the eligible participants and the permissibility of using specific personal data. Because such a state of affairs is unacceptable in a democratic legal state and attempts to resolve it through interpretative means have not yielded satisfactory results, selected arguments for providing participatory budgeting with new legal framework are presented. It also highlighted some benefits that could arise from regulating the participatory budget within electoral law (as a distinct type of local referendum) and proposed in an outline some specific solutions.

THE IMPACT OF THE PROPOSED CHANGES TO THE SYSTEM OF LOCAL REFERENDA ON THE POSITION OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT AUTHORITIES IN POLAND

The article is an attempt to assess the potential effects of the changes to the Local Referendum Act currently being processed by the Sejm of the 9th term, and proposed by the circles associated with the Kukiz’15 party. The authors focused on the changes concerning referenda on revoking the authority of a local government unit, with regard to: changing the number of signatures required to order a referendum from 10% to 5% (in the case of commune and poviat authorities) and from 5% to 2.5% (in the case of voivodship authorities) and lowering the referendum validity threshold to 15% (in the case of decision-making authorities), and 3/5 of the number of votes cast for the incumbent mayor/president of the city. The hypotheses of a significant facilitation in the organization of referenda and in the dismissal of both the legislative and executive authorities of the local government were verified.