- Author:
Agnieszka Tomczyk
- E-mail:
a.tomczyk4@uw.edu.pl
- Institution:
Uniwersytet Warszawski
- ORCID:
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7063-5130
- Year of publication:
2021
- Source:
Show
- Pages:
124-144
- DOI Address:
https://doi.org/10.15804/npw20212906
- PDF:
npw/29/npw2906.pdf
Borderization in the politics of Georgian and South Ossetian power elites
The dissolution of the Soviet Union led to both the restoration of independent states and the emergence of entities with the status of unrecognized states. In the aftermath of the five-day Georgia-Russia conflict of August 2008, the borderization incidents have intensified. The process involves the installation of barbed fences along the Administrative Boundary Line (ABL) between Georgia and South Ossetia, and shifting border marks deep into the Georgia-controlled territory to transform the official ceasefire line into an international border by the Russian FSB border guards. The paper aims to examine how ‘borderization’ activities have affected the politics of Georgian and South Ossetian ruling elites. By becoming a part of the political and social debate, border incidents have allowed victimization the Georgian nation to be presented to the world. However, especially in 2012-2013, the two main political parties in Georgia differed in their perceptions of borderization. From South Ossetian perspective, in turn, the process has served as a manifestation of strengthening national identity, independence from Georgia, and above all, the belief in Ossetian statehood guaranteed by Russia’s military presence and the growing importance of the military elite. The methodology of the work is based on the case study approach, as well as critical analysis of literature, documents, web content and a review of archival materials. The paper also includes data obtained during the 2018 and 2019 field research in Abkhazia and in the IDPs camp in Shavshvebi, near the Georgian-Ossetian border.
- Author:
Olga Wasiuta
- E-mail:
olga.wasiuta@up.krakow.pl
- Institution:
Uniwersytet Pedagogiczny im. KEN w Krakowie
- ORCID:
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0481-1567
- Author:
Sergiusz Wasiuta
- E-mail:
sergiusz.wasiuta@up.krakow.pl
- Institution:
Uniwersytet Pedagogiczny im. KEN w Krakowie
- ORCID:
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3402-963X
- Year of publication:
2021
- Source:
Show
- Pages:
9-31
- DOI Address:
https://doi.org/10.15804/npw20213001
- PDF:
npw/30/npw3001.pdf
“Little war” of Russia and Georgia and the start of the drone armor race
This article examines drone usage by Russia and Georgia in Five-Day War during 2008. Rapidly increasing the use of lethal drones profoundly shapes the ability of various countries and armed groups to wage war. This could have serious consequences for regional security. The rapidly increasing use of drones and robots as well as data-driven military analysis are likely to have a significant impact on the future of hostilities in military operations. In this article, the authors want to answer the most important questions related to this five-day war: what were the causes of Russo-Georgian war, who started this war, who were the winners of this war and who lost it, who helped to end this war. Authors emphasize that the war showed weaknesses in NATO and EU security systems, as they did not react effectively to the forced border change and Russia’s territory occupation of an independent state. The war also showed cracks in Europe between Western powers that wanted to maintain good relations with Russia and Eastern European Countries at the same time.
- Author:
Andrzej Furier
- E-mail:
andrzej.furier@usz.edu.pl
- Institution:
Uniwersytet Szczeciński
- ORCID:
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3745-3578
- Year of publication:
2022
- Source:
Show
- Pages:
9-31
- DOI Address:
https://doi.org/10.15804/npw20223501
- PDF:
npw/35/npw3501.pdf
Georgian efforts for rapprochement with the West after 1991
The paper presents the changes in Georgian foreign policy after the collapse of the USSR. The historical context of Georgian ties with the West and attempts to build their own security policy after 1991, which required resignation from the traditional support for Germany. The analysis covers the period from the proclamation of independence and the first free parliamentary elections in 1990 to the 2013. For the politicians of the Second Republic, relations with Russia and the support shown to the Georgian state by the United States were of key importance. The August war in 2008 inhibited Georgian activity in the international arena and restored Russian influence in that country
- Author:
Andrzej Furier
- E-mail:
andrzej.furier@usz.edu.pl
- Institution:
Uniwersytet Szczeciński
- ORCID:
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3745-3578
- Year of publication:
2023
- Source:
Show
- Pages:
41-63
- DOI Address:
https://doi.org/10.15804/npw20233903
- PDF:
npw/39/npw3903.pdf
German contacts with the Caucasus in the 18th and 19th centuries
The paper presents the initial period of German-Caucasian contacts, which includes the activity of German travelers, scientists and settlers in the 18th and 19th centuries. These activities were carried out during the period of Russian rule over Caucasus. The influence of the unification of Germany in 1871 on the intensification of German-Caucasian relations and a change in their character was noted. From then on, they were an element of the foreign policy of the Second Reich, which increased German-Caucasian economic exchange and led to political cooperation in the 20th century.