- Author:
Sabina Grabowska
- Institution:
Uniwersytet Rzeszowski
- Year of publication:
2013
- Source:
Show
- Pages:
151-164
- DOI Address:
https://doi.org/10.15804/ppk.2013.04.07
- PDF:
ppk/16/ppk1607.pdf
The Constitutional Responsibility of the President of Serbia
The topic of this article is the constitutional responsibility of the President of Serbia and the powers of the parliament and the Constitutional Court in this regard. The procedures governing the President for pulling constitutional responsibility begins with the submission of the proposal in Parliament on the indictment of President of having committed a constitutional delict and carrying preliminary proceedings by the committee and adoption by Parliament of a resolution on the adoption or rejection of the application. When determining and adjudicating authority is the Parliament, a group of deputies initiated the proceedings. Then the major procedure is carried out and shall be tested the charges against President. In addition, the committed by the President of the constitutional delict is required the Constitutional Court decision. At the end of voting takes place on the submission of the President from office because of committing a constitutional delict and order early elections for President. The decision is made by a resolution of Parliament.
- Author:
Artur Trubalski
- E-mail:
atrubalski@ur.edu.pl
- Institution:
Uniwersytet Rzeszowski
- ORCID:
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8020-9178
- Author:
Justyna Trubalska
- E-mail:
justyna.trubalska@poczta.umcs.lublin.pl
- Institution:
Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej w Lublinie
- ORCID:
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6508-0580
- Year of publication:
2021
- Source:
Show
- Pages:
213-224
- DOI Address:
https://doi.org/10.15804/ppk.2021.04.11
- PDF:
ppk/62/ppk6211.pdf
Foreign policy of the Republic of Poland. Considerations in the context of the March constitution and the constitution of 1997
The aim of the study is to analyze the constitutional solutions concerning the conduct of foreign policy by the Republic of Poland. The areas of consideration will include solutions that functioned under the rule of the March constitution, as well as solutions that were enshrined in the binding constitution of 1997. The analysis of the current solutions will also include issues related to European policy. The aim of the article is to present and compare the solutions contained in the March constitution and the constitution of 1997. The solutions functioning under each of the analyzed constitutions assume the primacy of one of the executive authorities in the field of conducting the state’s foreign policy. The analysis of individual solutions in this respect leads to the conclusion that the burden of conducting foreign policy by the president under the March constitution was transferred under the 1997 constitution to the Council of Ministers and the Prime Minister.