- Author:
Agnieszka Kasińska-Metryka
- Institution:
Uniwersytet im. Jana Kochanowskiego w Kielcach
- Year of publication:
2014
- Source:
Show
- Pages:
166-174
- DOI Address:
http://dx.doi.org/10.15804/ksm201413
- PDF:
ksm/19/ksm201413.pdf
Polish and Spanish way of democratisations seems to be similar; however, nowadays Spanish government has to face up to the economic crisis. The main idea of the article is to compare political systems, especially how the local government invests money in so-called tourist attractions. As well as being useless, many of those objects are too expensive to be maintained. It is worth mentioning that some Polish local governments try to implement Spanish ideas (so-called “Bilbao effect”) to their environment, which is not only risky, but also unsuccessful.
- Author:
Arkadiusz Niedziółka
- Year of publication:
2013
- Source:
Show
- Pages:
122-135
- DOI Address:
http://dx.doi.org/10.15804/ksm201309
- PDF:
ksm/18/ksm201309.pdf
The history of agritourism and aspects of agritourism services management in Limanowa county
In the article institutions like agritourism associations and local authorities which take part in the process of agritourism services management in Limanowa County were presented. These institutions manages different matters like promotion and widely understood marketing. To aim it in the period February-March this year questionnaire researches were carried out in all ten rural communities in the county. In March this year questionnaire researches were carried out with the chambers of “The Agritourism Association of the Limanowa County” and “The Association of Tourism and Agritourism of Mountainous Regions”. Besides, history of agritourism development in this part of Malopolska Voivodeship was presented. It was made on the basis of data from the Tourism Institute in Warsaw and from results of researches carried out by the author of this article.
- Author:
Hanna Przybyła-Basista
- E-mail:
przybyla@us.edu.pl
- Institution:
Uniwersytet Śląski w Katowicach
- Year of publication:
2015
- Source:
Show
- Pages:
47-71
- DOI Address:
https://doi.org/10.15804/kie.2015.03.03
- PDF:
kie/109/kie10903.pdf
The objective of this paper was to analyze the socio-cultural and personal reasons pivotal to the openness of the conflicting parties to a dialogue in the framework of family mediation. In the quest to answer the question what factors can influence the development of the family mediation in Poland and its acceptance both by the society and the families in conflict, the author presented the results of international and Polish research on the efficacy of the family mediation process and the readiness of the parties to use the mediation in family conflicts. Two theoretical concepts characterizing the socio-cultural origins of resistance to mediation were analyzed in detail, namely that of the social resistance proposed by B. Mayer and that of the moral resistance by R. Benjamin. Moreover, the paper addressed the issue of the promotion of mediation together with the unrealistic expectations as to what can be achieved through mediation, mythologization of mediation and dilemma connected with the neutrality of the mediator. Finally, an integrated systemic approach to family mediation was proposed, which could enhance the chances of acceptance of the mediation by the parties in conflict. In essence it is proposed that the promotion of mediation should be exercised on three levels: (1) general societal level (to promote the winwin solutions in family conflicts), (2) level of specific educational activities for the conflicted parties (e.g. organization of pre-mediation consultative meetings), and (3) level of specific actions targeted at various professional groups (e.g. judges, lawyers, probation officer, employees of the family support centres, etc).
- Author:
Thaer A. Ghbari
- Institution:
The Hashemite University, Jordan
- ORCID:
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8226-9676
- Year of publication:
2023
- Source:
Show
- Pages:
180-192
- DOI Address:
https://doi.org/10.15804/tner.23.71.1.14
- PDF:
tner/202301/tner7114.pdf
The current study aimed to explore the effect of regulatory Focus – Promotion vs. Prevention – in problem-solving among undergraduate students at The Hashemite University. The hypotheses were that promotion focus students outperform prevention focus students in ill-structured problems but underperform them in well-structured problems, and prevention focus students outperform promotion focus students in well-structured problems but underperform them in ill-structured problems. The participants (n=170) were allocated into four groups according to their mindsets and the problems assigned to them (promotion with ill-structured problems, promotion with well-structured problems, prevention with ill-structured problems, prevention with well-structured problems). After the groups solved all the assigned problems, their work was scored according to Measuring Problem Solving Instrument MPSI. The findings confirmed the hypothesis that the regulatory focus affects how problems are solved.