- Author:
Tomasz Czapiewski
- E-mail:
tomasz.czapiewski@usz.edu.pl
- Institution:
University of Szczecin
- ORCID:
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7861-8455
- Year of publication:
2021
- Source:
Show
- Pages:
53-62
- DOI Address:
https://doi.org/10.15804/ppk.2021.06.04
- PDF:
ppk/64/ppk6404.pdf
The aim of the text is the analysis of the tasks and activities of the municipal self-government during the organization of the 2020 election of the President in Poland during the period from the beginning of February to May 10, 2020, when, due to the development of the pandemic, the process of preparing the election took a different course. The study is based on documents and five in-depth expert interviews conducted with persons associated with the organization of the elections. This publication draws attention to the lack of knowledge about various aspects of the pandemic, the protraction of the decision-making process, the lack of cooperation, and citizens’ fears.
- Author:
Danuta Plecka
- Institution:
Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń
- Author:
Agnieszka Turska-Kawa
- Institution:
University of Silesiain Katowice
- Author:
Magdalena Musiał-Karg
- Institution:
Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań
- Author:
Karolina Tybuchowska-Hartlińska
- Institution:
University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn
- Author:
Agnieszka Łukasik-Turecka
- Institution:
Th e John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin
- Author:
Robert Alberski
- Institution:
University of Wrocław
- Author:
Waldemar Wojtasik
- Institution:
University of Silesia in Katowice
- Year of publication:
2014
- Source:
Show
- Pages:
177-182
- DOI Address:
https://doi.org/10.15804/athena.2014.44.11
- PDF:
apsp/44/apsp4411.pdf
Research on electoral identifications and attitudes and voting behavior is among the most popular planes of analysis of the citizens’ political participation. The presented article is a report from research carried out in the framework of the project “Political Preferences: Attitude – Identification – Behavior” in 2009 – 2014. It discusses the main assumptions and research directions, the tools used and, finally, the results obtained in the project. The presented research project is of a nationwide character, and is conducted on a representative sample of voters.
- Author:
Abdu Mukhtar Musa
- Institution:
Omdurman Islamic University (Sudan)
- ORCID:
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5927-8344
- Year of publication:
2023
- Source:
Show
- Pages:
79-95
- DOI Address:
https://doi.org/10.15804/ajepss.2023.1.06
- PDF:
ajepss/2-1/ajepss2023106.pdf
This article tries to examine the underpinning determinants of voting behavior in Sudan. It adopts a descriptive method and an inter-disciplinary approach with empirical explanation to verify the hypothesis that “voting behavior in Sudan is a function of religious sectarianism and ethnicity more than other determinants, such as ideology, class or socio-economic status.” It discusses the interrelationship between voting behavior and other relevant concepts, such as political behavior, electoral behavior, and political culture. It explains how several determinants/factors converge on influencing the voting behavior. The article notes that the vigorous influence of ethnicity and religious sectarianism over the political behavior in Sudan resulted in apparently irrational voting behavior. These two determinants have marked the political behavior in Sudan since it regained independence in 1956. However, the Uprising of 2018 ushered in an emergence of a new conscious generation that might lead to a paradigm shift for political and voting behavior. The article proposes the adoption of Consociational democracy with proportional representation and parliamentary system to guarantee the representation of minorities and sustain a fair share of power and wealth to put an end to instability and wars. In the case of Sudan, it is advisable that more attention should be paid to the development of political culture and efficacious civic engagement in politics should be boosted to increase conscious political participation to pave the way for sustainable democracy.