- Author:
Krystyna Gomółka
- E-mail:
Krystyna.Gomolka@zie.pg.edu.pl
- Institution:
Gdańsk University of Technology (Poland)
- Year of publication:
2018
- Source:
Show
- Pages:
20–38
- DOI Address:
http://dx.doi.org/10.15804/ppsy2018102
- PDF:
ppsy/47-1/ppsy2018102.pdf
Since gaining independence, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan gradually opened their markets to foreign investors. Before Poland’s accession to the European Union, the activities of Polish investors in Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan were based on bilateral treaties concluded by Poland with those countries. Later, except Turkmenistan, they were governed by the partnership and cooperation agreements between the European Communities and their Member States. Despite the ample investment opportunities and favourable conditions for access to the market, the activity of Polish companies in these markets has not produced a significant effect. Poland invested with more considerable success on the markets in Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan. It made investment attempts in Tajikistan and Uzbekistan, leaving out Turkmenistan. The reason why Poland has a weak position in these markets is the distance between the partners and inability of Polish companies to effectively compete with large multinational companies which have been operating there for years. In the Kazakh market, good investment prospects are available for waste management, petrochemical, mining and road construction companies. In Kyrgyzstan, there are cooperation possibilities in the area of modern agricultural and processing technologies and establishment of fruit and vegetable processing enterprises. In Tajikistan, enterprises can invest in petroleum and natural gas extraction and exploitation, the fuel market, processing of precious metals and construction of conventional and hydroelectric power plants. In Turkmenistan, Polish companies can compete for road, railway and housing construction contracts, whereas in Uzbekistan they can invest in businesses covered by government tax reductions.
- Author:
Tadeusz Bodio
- E-mail:
tbodio@wp.pl
- Institution:
University of Warsaw, Poland
- ORCID:
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8873-7434
- Author:
Andrzej Wierzbicki
- E-mail:
awierzbicki@uw.edu.pl
- Institution:
University of Warsaw, Poland
- ORCID:
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5493-164X
- Year of publication:
2020
- Source:
Show
- Pages:
111-133
- DOI Address:
https://doi.org/10.15804/ppsy2020307
- PDF:
ppsy/49-3/ppsy2020307.pdf
The article presents the goals, tasks, organization and major stages of implementation of the international programme of research on transformation in the countries Central Asia. The research has been conducted since 1997 by a team of political scientists from the University of Warsaw in cooperation with representatives of other Polish and foreign universities.
- Author:
Paulina Filkowska
- E-mail:
filkowskapaulina@gmail.com
- Institution:
Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu
- ORCID:
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0040-967X
- Year of publication:
2022
- Source:
Show
- Pages:
101-114
- DOI Address:
https://doi.org/10.15804/npw20223505
- PDF:
npw/35/npw3505.pdf
The conflict around the Rogun dam as an example of disputes over water resources
Water scarcity is an area of disputes between many states. Generally, these conflicts occur as a result of competition for water resources. They are especially visible in underdeveloped regions, such as Africa or the Middle East. Central Asia, the five republics established after the collapse of the USSR, is also an area exposed to conflicts. An example of such conflict can be the construction of the Rogun dam on Vakhsh river in Tajikistan. The project caused a lot of controversy and further construction fueled them even more. The aim of the paper is to present the conflict over the Rogun dam on the Vakhsh river in Tajikistan as an example of a conflict over water resources in Central Asia. The article presents the genesis and essence of the dispute, as well as attempts to resolve the conflict.
- Author:
Natasza Duraj
- E-mail:
natasza.duraj@eksoc.uni.lodz.pl
- Institution:
Uniwersytet Łódzki, Polska
- ORCID:
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0796-6620
- Year of publication:
2023
- Source:
Show
- Pages:
120-135
- DOI Address:
https://doi.org/10.15804/so2023208
- PDF:
so/26/so2608.pdf
Influence of the Ancient Bactria’s Legacy on the Economic and Social Development of Tajikistan
The article’s main goal is to present the influence of ancient Bactria’s legacy on the economic and social development of Tajikistan. The paper provides information about the ancient Bactria’s history – the country where early urban planning traditions and statehood foundations were formed in Central Asia. Bactria included the central, southern, and eastern parts of Tajikistan. In the 6th Century B.C. Bactria was conquered by the Persian king Cyrus and became part of his Achaemenid empire. From the 4th Century B.C. Bactria became known as Tokharistan. It was the moment when the Tajik nationality began to form.