- Author:
Artur Biłgorajski
- E-mail:
artur.bilgorajski@us.edu.pl
- Institution:
University of Silesia in Katowice
- ORCID:
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1389-4520
- Year of publication:
2020
- Source:
Show
- Pages:
15-34
- DOI Address:
https://doi.org/10.15804/ppk.2020.03.01
- PDF:
ppk/55/ppk5501.pdf
The reform of higher education in the Republic of Poland, which was introduced by the Act of 20 July 2018 Law on higher education and science (Dz.U. 2018, item 1668, as amended; hereinafter: Law on higher education and science), revitalized interests in the freedom of scientific research, optimal ways of its implementation and the role of the state in the support of scientific and research activities. For this reason providing an answer to questions concerning the genesis of regulation of the freedom of scientific research in the Constitution of the Republic of Poland of 2nd April, 1997 (Dz.U. 1997, No. 78, item 483, as amended; hereinafter: the Constitution of the Republic of Poland), specifically in relation to its recognition and position in the Polish constitution, the normative content of the freedom, the beneficiaries and entities obliged to comply with it, appears appropriate. These issues seem to be of particular importance. First of all, the freedom of scientific research shall be one of the crucial elements of a knowledge-based economy, with a significant role of higher educational institutions. Secondly, the proper functioning of universities indicates a broader establishment of human rights. What is more, the hitherto undertaken attempts to define the freedom of scientific research seem not to be incisive enough. The aim of this article, therefore, is to draw attention to the issues and difficulties associated with the freedom of scientific research. The answers given to the aforementioned questions, however, having regard to the limited scope of the publication, cannot be deemed definitive.
- Author:
Anna Chorążewska
- E-mail:
anna.chorazewska@us.edu.pl
- Institution:
Uniwersytet Śląski w Katowicach
- ORCID:
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2917-3119
- Year of publication:
2022
- Source:
Show
- Pages:
39-51
- DOI Address:
https://doi.org/10.15804/ppk.2022.03.03
- PDF:
ppk/67/ppk6703.pdf
The Constitutional Moral and Material Rights of Creators of Science de lege lata and de lege ferenda. Structural Issues in the Context of a Universal System of Protecting Human Rights
This paper focuses on analysing the relationship between intellectual property law and human rights in point of view protecting the moral and material interests of the creators of intangible goods. The paper aims to determine whether the catalogue of human rights includes the subjective right of the creators of intangible goods to protect their personal and material rights to the fruits of their intellectual work and reconstruct the content of this right. The considerations are carried out from the background of the Polish and universal system of protecting human rights and the legal requirement to provide adequate protection to the creators of Science. The paper concludes that the catalogue of human rights includes the subjective right of the creators of intangible goods to protect their moral and material interests and reconstruct the content of that right.
- Author:
Monika Stachowiak-Kudła
- E-mail:
mstachowiak@poczta.fm
- Institution:
Uniwersytet w Siedlcach
- ORCID:
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5718-454X
- Year of publication:
2023
- Source:
Show
- Pages:
273-288
- DOI Address:
https://doi.org/10.15804/ppk.2023.06.20
- PDF:
ppk/76/ppk7620.pdf
Perception of the Implementation of Academic Freedom by Academic Teachers in Poland
Stemming from the theory of the perception of human rights, the article identifies the main types of violations of academic freedom in Polish universities, the features of scientists, and the type of university the most often affected by these violations. The methods involve basic descriptive statistics measures and ordinary least squares regression. The study reveals that perceived academic freedom is higher for full professors or university professors than for assistant professors. The highest violations are felt by scientists holding lower academic positions but with long work experience. Academics employed at universities with a long tradition of education perceive the implementation of academic freedom more positively than their colleagues employed at universities with a short tradition of education.