• facebook

UWAGA!

Pracujemy nad nową stroną internetową czasopism Wydawnictwa Adam Marszałek. Jej planowany termin uruchomienia to 1 maja 2025 roku.

Ze względu na niedziałające zakładki w polskiej wersji obecnej strony czasopism prosimy kierować się na wersję angielską https://czasopisma.marszalek.com.pl/en/. Do końca bieżącego tygodnia będą tam umieszczone polskie wymogi i informacje na zmianę z angielskimi.

Przepraszamy za wszelkie niedogodności związane z obecną wersją strony.

ATTENTION!

We are working on a new website for Adam Marszałek Publishing House magazines. Its planned launch date is May 1, 2025.

Due to the broken tabs in the Polish version of the current magazine website, please refer to the English version https://czasopisma.marszalek.com.pl/en/. By the end of this week, Polish requirements and information will be placed there alternating with English ones.

We apologize for any inconvenience caused by the current version of the website.


Punktacja czasopism naukowych Wydawnictwa Adam Marszałek według wykazu czasopism naukowych i recenzowanych materiałów z konferencji międzynarodowych, ogłoszonego przez Ministra Edukacji i Nauki 17 lipca 2023 r.

Scoring of scientific journals of Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek according to the list of scientific journals and reviewed materials from international conferences, announced by the Minister of Education and Science on July 17, 2023.


  • Athenaeum. Polskie Studia Politologiczne – 100 pts
  • Edukacja Międzykulturowa – 100 pts
  • Historia Slavorum Occidentis – 100 pts
  • Polish Political Science Yearbook – 100 pts
  • Przegląd Prawa Konstytucyjnego – 100 pts
  • The New Educational Review – 100 pts
  • Art of the Orient – 70 pts
  • Italica Wratislaviensia – 70 pts
  • Nowa Polityka Wschodnia – 70 pts
  • Polish Biographical Studies – 70 pts
  • Azja-Pacyfik - 40 pts
  • Krakowskie Studia Małopolskie – 40 pts
  • Kultura i Edukacja – 40 pts
  • Reality of Politics - 40 pts
  • Studia Orientalne – 40 pts
  • Sztuka Ameryki Łacińskiej – 40 pts
  • Annales Collegii Nobilium Opolienses – 20 pts
  • Cywilizacja i Polityka – 20 pts
  • Defence Science Review - 20 pts
  • Pomiędzy. Polsko-Ukraińskie Studia Interdyscyplinarne – 20 pts
  • African Journal of Economics, Politics and Social Studies - 0 pts
  • Copernicus Political and Legal Studies - 0 pts
  • Copernicus. Czasy Nowożytne i Współczesne - 0 pts
  • Copernicus. De Musica - 0 pts
  • Viae Educationis. Studies of Education and Didactics - 0 pts

Journals

New journals

Co-published journals

Past journals

Coloquia Communia

Coloquia Communia

Paedagogia Christiana

Paedagogia Christiana

The Copernicus Journal of Political Studies

The Copernicus Journal of Political Studies

The Peculiarity of Man

The Peculiarity of Man

Czasopisma Marszalek.com.pl

The Common Security and Defence Policy of the European Union – in the context of ‘hybrid warfare’, ‘networks’, ‘swarming’ and ‘consolidated hybrid defence

  • Author: Benon Zbigniew Szałek
  • Institution: University of Szczecin
  • Year of publication: 2017
  • Source: Show
  • Pages: 125-140
  • DOI Address: https://doi.org/10.15804/rop201708
  • PDF: rop/2017/rop201708.pdf

The aim of this paper is to present some praxiological remarks on the so-called Common Security and Defence Policy (earlier: The European Security and Defence Policy) of the European Union in the light of such terms as ‘hybrid warfare’, ‘networks’, ‘swarming’. The paper emphasizes the problem of consolidated hybrid security and defense.

Common Security and Defence Policy of the European Union in Theories of the European Integration

  • Author: Luiza Wojnicz
  • Institution: University of Szczecin
  • Year of publication: 2013
  • Source: Show
  • Pages: 316-335
  • DOI Address: https://doi.org/10.15804/rop201319
  • PDF: rop/2013/rop201319.pdf

  The purpose of this article is synthetic analysis of the theories concerning the Security and Defence Policy of the European Union. Author analyses neorealist and neofunctionalist theories and marginally takes into account theory of liberal intergovernmentalism and new institutionalism theory
  Neorealists argued that in order to understand CSDP, one should look at the changing nature of the balance of power and the way in which member states sought profits coming from the negotiation process, which took place between European Union and NATO. Liberal intergovernmetalists, including Andrew Moravcsik, assumed that CSDP is a factor created and driven by the domestic policy of member states, although both NATO and EU institutions influenced this process. Neofunctionalists’ hypothesis assumed that CSDP is a result of the spill-over effect – consequence of the economic integration. They demonstrated, through economic analysis, the impact of economic and monetary union on the process of development of the European security and defence policy. In neoinstitutionalist theory, the emergence of the CSDP is explained by highlighting the impact of international institutions in the foreign policy of the EU and NATO member states.
  Above hypotheses have the objective of finding the causes of the CSDP’s emergence, but are also an attempt to answer the question what is the CSDP. Exitisting theories do not adress the whole issue comprehensively, because they are missing implication of links between supranational, transnational and intergovernmental dimension of CSDP, indicating only the conceptualization of evolution and the role of the various bodies at different levels, particularly in the theories of neoliberalism, neoinstitutionalism and intergovernmental liberalism.

Ewolucja Wspólnej Polityki Bezpieczeństwa i Obrony UE pod wpływem działań Komisji Europejskiej – identyfikacja tendencji i ocena perspektyw jej trwałości

  • Author: Piotr Śledź
  • Institution: Uniwersytet Warszawski
  • ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4562-7491
  • Year of publication: 2024
  • Source: Show
  • Pages: 242-267
  • DOI Address: https://doi.org/10.15804/athena.2024.81.13
  • PDF: apsp/81/apsp8113.pdf

The evolution of the EU’s Common Security and Defence Policy under the influence of the European Commission – identifying a trend and assessing prospects for its continuance

Since the mid-2010s, the nature of EU’s CSDP has been constantly evolving – the significance of crisis management decreases, while the defence industry-related cooperation becomes increasingly intense. This is also manifested in the wider use of mechanisms inherent in “civilian” European integration – establishing of programs and funds in particular. The key driver of this change is arguably the active attitude of the European Commission, which has finally gained influence on the shape of the CSDP-related agenda through the instruments it has developed. This paper aims to characterize the key manifestations of this phenomenon and the broader logic behind (especially the determinants of such an evolution), and to analyze its significance for the EU’s “strategic autonomy” aspirations – opportunities for and potential constraints on making the cooperation within CSDP more dynamic.

Message to:

 

 

© 2017 Adam Marszałek Publishing House. All rights reserved.

Projekt i wykonanie Pollyart