Wyłączenie stosowania art. 148 (1) § 3 Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego w świetle konstytucyjnego wymogu jawnego rozpatrzenia sprawy
- Institution: Uniwersytet Rzeszowski
- ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2656-3453
- Year of publication: 2024
- Source: Show
- Pages: 79-89
- DOI Address: https://doi.org/10.15804/ppk.2024.02.06
- PDF: ppk/78/ppk7806.pdf
Exclusion of Article 148 (1) § 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure in the Light of the Constitutional Right to an Open Hearing
The purpose of this study is to analyze the constitutionality of the provisions excluding the application of Art. 148 (1) § 3 of the Civil Procedure Code – i.e. Art. 505 (1a) and 205 (5) § 1 (1), added by the Act of 9 March 2023 amending the Civil Procedure Code and certain other acts. These provisions deprive a party of the right to submit a motion that allows preventing a case from being heard at a closed session pursuant to Art. 148 (1) § 1. This occurred in cases in which a preparatory hearing was scheduled but the dispute was not resolved, and in cases heard in simplified procedure, where the value of the subject matter of the dispute does not exceed PLN 4,000. These changes make it even more difficult to defend the thesis on the constitutionality of hearing the case in accordance with Art. 148 (1) § 1.