Modification of two-instance proceedings by the “flattering”  as a remedy for excessive length of court proceedings –  selected issues related to proceedings before administrative courts

Efficiency as well as efficacy of courts proceedings seems to be vital factor for both society and economic growth. However, legal infrastructure and two-instance proceedings cause backlogs. This is to say lack of court efficiency is to some extend related to the shape of legal remedies; yet constitutional pedigree of given principles consequently broadens the scope of further modifications. Therefore, lawmakers are searching for optimal model of two-instance proceedings. Within wide spectrum of given solutions one will be the subject of this paper i.e. so-called “flattening” of court instance. Especially, authors tried to determine whether modifications of court instance are proper remedy for achieving lesser caseload.

Protection of an Individual Legal Interest as the Basis for an Individual’s Legitimacy to File a Complaint with the Provincial Administrative Court

The entity entitled to bring a complaint to the Provincial Administrative Court is anyone with a legal interest in this. The mere fact of submitting a complaint based on an individual’s individual legal interest results in an obligation on the part of the Provincial Administrative Court to examine the interest of the complainant. If the court, during the examination, does not find a connection between the action or action complained about and the interests of the complainant, it will be forced to disregard the complaint, which will result in its dismissal. The analyzed article expresses a very important principle known as the right to a fair trial. This is a consequence of the rule that only the court is the body that ultimately decides about the freedoms, rights and obligations of an individual. The right of an individual to assert his rights before a competent, independent, impartial and independent court.