- Author:
Krzysztof Prokop
- E-mail:
kprokop@pwsip.edu.pl
- Institution:
Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Informatyki i Przedsiębiorczości w Łomży
- Year of publication:
2018
- Source:
Show
- Pages:
39-56
- DOI Address:
https://doi.org/10.15804/ppk.2018.02.02
- PDF:
ppk/42/ppk4202.pdf
Responsibility of Members of the Federal Government in Belgium
The article is devoted to the responsibility of members of the Federal Government in Belgium. The main part of the study concerns the mechanisms of political responsibility. They include individual responsibility of ministers and collective responsibility of the cabinet. According to the original version of the Belgian Constitution of 1831 ministers were responsible to the king. Currently, the House of Representatives is authorized to enforce the individual responsibility of the minister by passing a vote of no confidence. In such situation the king is obliged to dismiss the minister. The entire cabinet may be the addressee of the motion of no confidence, too (collective responsibility). Since 1993 there has been the possibility of overthrowing the government through a constructive vote of no confidence. The article also discusses the problem of legal responsibility of ministers.
- Author:
Marek Woźnicki
- E-mail:
marek.kamil.woznicki@gmail.com
- Institution:
Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej
- Year of publication:
2018
- Source:
Show
- Pages:
97-119
- DOI Address:
https://doi.org/10.15804/ppk.2018.02.06
- PDF:
ppk/42/ppk4206.pdf
Individual Political Responsibility of the Cabinet Minister in Political Practice under the Constitution of the Republic of Poland from 2nd April 1997
According to the Constitution of Poland from 2nd April 1997, a cabinet minister is political responsible for the political direction of his office to the Sejm and to the Prime Minister. The main goal of this paper is to show, that in practice, the political responsibility of the ministers before the Sejm is illusory. The majority of the vote required to adopt a motion of no confidence is so high that its vote is only possible in exceptional circumstances. Since 1997, no motion of no confidence have been successful, so the Sejm has never succeeded in enforcing the resignation of a minister. That is why, only the political responsibility of the minister before the Prime Minister has a real meaning. The head of government can lead to the dismissal of each minister at any time. When deciding to file an application to dismiss a minister, the Prime Minister must take into account only whether such a decision does not endanger the political support of the majority of the Sejm.
- Author:
Marek Woźnicki
- E-mail:
marek.kamil.woznicki@ gmail.com
- Institution:
Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej w Lublinie
- Year of publication:
2018
- Source:
Show
- Pages:
161-185
- DOI Address:
https://doi.org/10.15804/ppk.2018.05.10
- PDF:
ppk/45/ppk4510.pdf
Some remarks about formal requirements of the motion of no confidence to a cabinet minister
According to the Constitution of Poland from 2nd April 1997, a cabinet minister is political responsible to the Sejm and to the Prime Minister. The Sejm has power to lead to the dismissal of each minister by passing a motion of no confidence. The main goal of this paper is to show the formal requirements of an motion of no confidence to a single minister, and to answer questions: what are the reasons explaining to submit this kind of motion and when member of parliament have a right to demand a dismissal of a cabinet minister. In this paper it is shown the results of an analysis of motions of no confidence to a cabinet minister from 1997 to 2015.