- Author:
Michał Brzeziński
- Institution:
Uniwersytet Warszawski
- Year of publication:
2011
- Source:
Show
- Pages:
135-152
- DOI Address:
https://doi.org/10.15804/ppk.2011.04.07
- PDF:
ppk/08/ppk807.pdf
The Position of the President of the Republic of Azerbaijan in the Country’s Political System
The article presents the constitutional position of the President of the Republic of Azerbaijan. In the article the author describes the issues: election, term, legal status, relations with parliament (Milli Majlis), government (the Cabinet of ministers), courts and prosecution, and the powers in the next cases: international, security, legislation and traditional.
- Author:
Rafał Czachor
- E-mail:
rczachor@afm.edu.pl
- Institution:
Krakowska Akademia im. Andrzeja Frycza Modrzewskiego
- ORCID:
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5929-9719
- Year of publication:
2024
- Source:
Show
- Pages:
13-23
- DOI Address:
https://doi.org/10.15804/ppk.2024.01.01
- PDF:
ppk/77/ppk7701.pdf
Constitutional Responsibility of the Presidents in the Post-Soviet Authoritarian States
The article tackles the issue of constitutional responsibility of the Presidents of post-Soviet authoritarian republics (Russia, Belarus, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, and Turkmenistan). This institution exists in the legal orders of most of them, although the complicated procedure, that involves parliaments, supreme courts, and constitutional courts makes it hardly possible to successfully impeach the President. This confirms the thesis that the institution of a democratic state of law in the case of most post-Soviet countries is just a facade. The consecutive parts of the text discuss the existing models of constitutional responsibility of the Presidents of democratic countries, the views of Russian-language legal doctrine regarding this issue, and the regulations implemented by the post-Soviet authoritarian states. The procedure is multi- stage, and the reason for impeachment may be a state treason or a serious crime, but generally not a constitutional tort.