Artykuł prezentuje stanowisko Ukraińskiej Cerkwi Prawosławnej (Patriarchatu Moskiewskiego) wobec Euromajdanu na Ukrainie na przełomie 2013/2014 r. Kościół ten zajął pozycję neutralną, w odróżnieniu od niektórych innych związków wyznaniowych, zwłaszcza tak zwanych Kościołów narodowych, które poparły protestujących. Jego oficjalne stanowisko wyrażało się w apelach do zachowania pokoju, porządku społecznego, integralności terytorialnej i jedności narodu, potępienia przemocy, nawoływania stron konfliktu do rozpoczęcia i kontynuacji dialogu. W artykule szczegółowo przeanalizowano przyczyny i skutki stanowiska Cerkwi.

The objective of this article is to establish the main goal the leaders of the parliamentary opposition wanted to achieve in the negotiations with the government during the Euromaidan. In this study, the following methods were applied: the historical method, data analysis, and case study. In the conclusion, it is noted that the main task of the parliamentary opposition in the negotiations with the government was to restore the Constitution of 2004, which limited the presidential competences in executive power and extended

The aim of this article is to define the role of the organisations established by the parliamentary opposition during the Euromaidan. The political opposition created the National Resistance Headquarters and the All-Ukrainian Union “Maidan” at that time. In the long term, they were supposed to become a tool for the opposition in the upcoming presidential elections. In the short term, in turn, they were to coordinate the actions of protesters during the Euromaidan throughout Ukraine. In order to achieve the research objective, the historical, systemic, and case study methods were used.