- Author:
Natalia Gburzyńska
- Institution:
Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń (Poland)
- Year of publication:
2014
- Source:
Show
- Pages:
348–362
- DOI Address:
http://dx.doi.org/10.15804/ppsy2014020
- PDF:
ppsy/43/ppsy2014020.pdf
This article refers to the contemporary situation in the Russian economy and in the Russian capital economy. Economy in Russia is based on the extraction of raw materials. However, in 2010 economic forecasts for the country were optimistic. In this period economic development was strong and the country became a member of the BRICS group. One of the issues of the Russian Federation economy was the backing of the old system. Most investments were focused on the energy sector when in the public sector the changes were smaller. To increase revenues and funds big reforms are necessary and new investments. One possibility to improve the economic situation is to focus on greater extraction of raw materials. Another option is to resign from a monocultural economy. The situation in Moscow is better than the general economic situation in the Russian Federation. GDP increased regularly. In 2008 Russia took 15th place in the ranking of the hundred largest cities GDP. Th e Moscow economy is based especially on the trade of energy resources. Moreover, profi t is gained from business activities and industry. The level of unemployment in Moscow is the lowest in comparison to all regions. In the capital city it fluctuates between 0,5% and 1%. A major problem in the capital city is the constant immigration from other part of the Federation and other foreign countries. In majority, people who come to Moscow are the job seekers. Also the signifi cant problem is ubiquitous corruption.
- Author:
Jacek Tittenbrun
- E-mail:
jacek@amu.edu.pl
- Institution:
Adam Mickiewicz University
- Year of publication:
2015
- Source:
Show
- Pages:
95-113
- DOI Address:
https://doi.org/10.15804/kie.2015.02.06
- PDF:
kie/108/kie10806.pdf
The hallmark of French thinker undoubtedly is worthy of critical attention. To make this task feasible, the paper focuses not on the secondary literature, but on Bourdieu’s work itself. Thanks to what follows, one is able to establish whether the conception of various capitals stands up to analytical scrutiny. And an outcome of this examination has even broader relevanceBourdieu is the most prolific exponent of an entire trend, much in vogue in social science recently. It would be difficult to indicate a field of inquiry in which this or that unorthodox, extra-economic concept of capital has not been deployed as a research tool. The result of this critical analysis are not encouraging; Bourdieu’s framework is plagued by economism or economic imperialism, and suffers from other limitations as well.
- Author:
Mariusz Bidziński
- E-mail:
mariusz@bidzinski.pl
- Institution:
SWPS Uniwersytet Humanistycznospołeczny
- ORCID:
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3646-8997
- Year of publication:
2022
- Source:
Show
- Pages:
109-114
- DOI Address:
https://doi.org/10.15804/ppk.2022.05.08
- PDF:
ppk/69/ppk6908.pdf
System Models of the Capital of Poland and Selected European Union Countries
Regulations concerning the position, status and model of functioning of capitals in European countries have not been unified. Both Poland and other European Union countries use their own, autonomous solutions. It is a fact that there are a lot of similarities in this area, but nevertheless they do not have formal, legal, regulatory or directive conditions. The many similarities have historical or geopolitical roots. A number of regulations are also related to the care for the stability of legal solutions, the organizational stability of the state and international bodies and institutions. The conducted analysis allows, however, to distinguish three main organizational models, which have certain advantages, but also negative management and organizational aspects.
- Author:
Mateusz Kufliński
- Institution:
Uniwersytet Gdański
- ORCID:
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7395-3513
- Year of publication:
2023
- Source:
Show
- Pages:
63-75
- DOI Address:
https://doi.org/10.15804/athena.2023.77.04
- PDF:
apsp/77/apsp7704.pdf
David Harvey’s theory of accumulation by dispossession: new research perspectives – the case of Jason W. Moore
This article reconstructs David Harvey’s accumulation by dispossession (ABD) theory aimed at explaining the specifics of capital accumulation under neoliberal capitalism. Reaching back to the thought of Marx and Rosa Luxemburg, Harvey proposed an impressive theory of qualitative change within the capitalist mode of production. However, as his critics have convincingly presented, Harvey’s concept struggles with the problems presented in the text. The solution to these problems appears to be the school of “world-ecology”, analyzed here on the example of one of its representatives, Jason W. Moore. By solving the problems that Bin and Ras wrote about, it creates the possibility for APW to become a theory that shows a certain continuum of quantitative change within capitalism. In other words, Moore’s research perspective creates new perspectives for the application of APW.