- Author:
Marek Jeziński
- Year of publication:
2016
- Source:
Show
- Pages:
213-227
- DOI Address:
https://doi.org/10.15804/kie.2016.03.12
- PDF:
kie/113/kie11312.pdf
The paper concerns on advantages and disadvantages of survey researches used as tools in the process of evaluation of education quality in contemporary Poland. Education quality is usually surveyed by using questionnaires accessible in electronic internet form as a part of the USOS system. It is implied that survey, as a research method, is an effective means applicable to measure opinions, attitudes and expectations of the students. Moreover, the internet form of survey takes the most of advantages of the traditional forms of research, which makes it an efficient tool in the process of evaluation in the higher education. This way of research prevail at Polish universities.
- Author:
Daniel Dariusz Mider
- E-mail:
d.mider@uw.edu.pl
- Institution:
Uniwersytet Warszawski
- ORCID:
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2223-5997
- Year of publication:
2021
- Source:
Show
- Pages:
243-258
- DOI Address:
https://doi.org/10.15804/kie.2021.03.14
- PDF:
kie/133/kie13314.pdf
Art and science of creating a questionnaires in quantitative research. New reality and new challenges
The text enriches the theoretical reflection on the standardization of measurement tools in the methodology of social sciences. The need for this text is also, to some extent, didactic and organizing the reflection so far. This article presents the original concept of analyzing questionnaire questions on three following levels: content-related, logical, and psychological. The substantive / content-related level refers to the division according to the way of construction - structure, format - questions and/or answers. On the other hand, the logical plane is a division according to the functions given questions or groups of questions fulfilled in a broader context, i.e. concerning the whole questionnaire. The psychological plane was distinguished due to the intended or unintended but unavoidable emotional reactions evoked by the respondent). In the last part of the text, a reflection on the most common errors in research tools is presented and recommendations for avoiding them are formulated.
- Author:
Tatiana Kanasz
- E-mail:
tkanash@aps.edu.pl
- Institution:
Instytut Filozofii i Socjologii Akademii Pedagogiki Specjalnej im. M. Grzegorzewskiej
- ORCID:
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7389-5683
- Author:
Agata Chutnik
- E-mail:
achutnik@gmail.com
- Institution:
badaczka niezależna
- ORCID:
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5915-8641
- Year of publication:
2024
- Source:
Show
- Pages:
7-25
- DOI Address:
https://doi.org/10.15804/ksm20240101
- PDF:
ksm/41/ksm4101.pdf
National Identity of Belarusians and Lithuanians: A Comparative Sociological Study
The article is a comparative analysis of the national identity of Belarusians and Lithuanians. The authors present in turn the complex processes of the formation of national identity of two groups, show their specificities in the historical, cultural and social dimensions, point to the differences and similarities, which emerge on the basis of the review of Belarusian, Lithuanian and international social research, conducted in 2010–2022. After the collapse of the Soviet Union, Lithuania and Belarus took different paths, which influenced the formation of a more consistent model of national identity for Lithuanians and complex and ambivalent one for Belarusians.