political speech

Glosa do wyroku Sądu Okręgowego w Kielcach z 25 sierpnia 2022 r., sygn. akt IX Ka 715/22

Author: Jan Witold Kulesza
Institution: Uniwersytet Łódzki
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0574-9120
Year of publication: 2023
Source: Show
Pages: 311-317
DOI Address: https://doi.org/10.15804/ppk.2023.01.24
PDF: ppk/71/ppk7124.pdf

Gloss to the Judgment of the District Court in Kielce of August 25, 2022, file ref. no. IX Ka 715/22

The gloss aims to indicate the limits of freedom of expression, set by provisions on hate speech and destruction of property. These limits are indicated by the analyzed case where the property was damaged as a result of publicly displaying political posters. However, the court misinterpreted the law, leading to a conviction for an offense rather than a crime. There was also no obligation to redress the damage. The author discusses how there were generally no grounds for conviction and the accused should be acquitted for a different reason.

„Brutalizacja wypowiedzi politycznej w Europie”? Uwagi nad wyrokiem Europejskiego Trybunału Praw Człowieka w sprawie Ziembiński przeciwko Polsce (2), 2016

Author: Wiesław Wacławczyk
Institution: Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
Year of publication: 2017
Source: Show
Pages: 49-63
DOI Address: https://doi.org/10.15804/tpn2017.1.04
PDF: tpn/12/TPN2017104.pdf

The text examines standards of freedom of speech stipulated by the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg. The focus is on political expression, which deserves the greatest scope of protection according to Western norms determined by the jurisprudence of the mentioned court and the Supreme Court of the United States. In this connection, the latter has significantly influenced the case-law of the former. The text under discussion analyses the problem from the perspective of the case of Ziembiński versus Poland (2), 2016.

Message to:



© 2017 Adam Marszałek Publishing House. All rights reserved.

Projekt i wykonanie Pollyart