Author: Lenka Venterová
Institution: Uniwersytet Tomasza Baty w Zlinie
Year of publication: 2018
Source: Show
Pages: 179-192
DOI Address: https://doi.org/10.15804/em.2018.02.09
PDF: em/9/em909.pdf

Dzieci trzeciej kultury są stosunkowo nowym podmiotem badań w Republice Czeskiej. Niniejsze badania jakościowe obejmują dzieci, których językami ojczystymi są czeski i angielski, a każdy z rodziców ma inne zaplecze kulturowe. Ich dzieci uczęszczające do szkół podstawowych w Republice Czeskiej muszą często pokonać innego rodzaju problemy dotyczące przygotowania się do nauki szkolnej niż ich jednokulturowi rówieśnicy. W części metodologicznej staram się zidentyfikować te problemy oraz powody zamieszkania tego typu rodzin mieszanych w Republice Czeskiej, mimo że nie zawsze jest to dla ich dzieci łatwe.

Third culture children in the Czech Republic: the influence of parents’ cultures on preparing for school

Third culture children are relatively a new research topic in the Czech Republic. This qualitative study pursues children, whose native languages are Czech and English, and each of their parent is from different cultural backround. Their children attend primary schools in the Czech Republic, often encounter different problems in preparing for school education than their monocultural peers. In the methodological part, attermpts are made to identify these problems, together with the reasons why these families live in the Czech Republic, although it is not always easy for their children.

References:

  • Adair, W.L., Tinsley, C.H. and Taylor, M.S. 2006. Managing the intercultural interface: Third cultures, antecedents, and consequences. Research on Managing Groups and Teams. 7, pp. 205–232
  • Barnes ,M. and Rowe, J. eds. 2008. Child, youth and family health: strength­ening communities. Chatswood, N.S.W: Elsevier Australia.
  • Bělohradská, J., Solfronk, J. and Urbánek, P. 2001. Problematika zatíženosti žáků základní školy domácí přípravou. Nové možnosti vzdělávání a peda­gogický výzkum. Sborník z IX. celostátní konference ČAPV s mezinárodní účastí. Ostrava: Pedagogická fakulta OU, ss. 264–268.
  • Beníšková, T. 2007. První třídou bez pláče: výběr školy, první školní den, učitelé a spolužáci, domácí příprava, mimoškolní činnost, když nastanou problémy. Praha: Grada.
  • Bennett, S. and Kalish, N. 2006. The case against homework: How homework is hurting our children and what we can do about it. New York: Crown.
  • Breger, R. and Hill, R. 1998. Cross-cultural marriage: Identity and choice. New York: Bergamon.
  • Clarke, A.E. 2005. Situational analysis. Grounded theory after the postmod­ern turn. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  • Cooper, H., Robinson, J.C., and Patall, E.A. 2006. Does homework improve academic achievement? A synthesis of research, 1987–2003. Review of Educational Research. 76 (1), pp. 1–62.
  • Frame, M.W. 2004. The Challenges of Intercultural Marriage: Strategies for Pastoral Care. Pastoral Psychology. 52 (3), pp. 219–232.
  • Kalmijn, M. 1998. Intermarriage and Homogamy: Causes, Patterns, Trends. Annual Review of Sociology. 24 (1), pp. 395–421. http://www.annualre­views.org/doi/10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.395 (3.03.2018).
  • Kralovec, E. and Buell, J. 2000. The end of homework: How homework disrupts families, overburdens children, and limits learning. Boston: Beacon.
  • Kohn, A. 2006. The homework myth: Why our kids get too much of a bad thing. Cambridge, MA: Da Capo Press.
  • O‘Neal, V.P., Brown, P.M., and Abadie, T. 1997. Treatment implications for interracial couples. Cross-cultural practice with couples and families. New York: The Haworth Press, Inc.
  • Piller, I. 2007. Cross-cultural communication in intimate relationships. Hand­book of Intercultural Communication. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Průcha, J., Walterová E. and Mareš. 2103. J. Pedagogický slovník. Praha: Por­tál.
  • Rabušicová, M., Šeďová, K., Trnková, K. and Čiháček, V. 2004. Škola a (ver­sus) rodina. Brno: Masarykova univerzita.
  • Roca, J., and Urmeneta, A. 2013. Bi-national Weddings in Spain: A Recent and Increasingly Frequent Phenomenon in the Context of the Global­ization of the Marriage Market. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sci­ences. 82, pp. 567–573. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1877042813013785 (3.4.2018)
  • Rodríguez-García, D. 2006. Mixed Marriages and Transnational Families in the Intercultural Context: A Case Study of African-Spanish Couples in Catalonia, Spain. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies. 32 (3), pp. 403– –433. https://ddd.uab.cat/pub/artpub/2006/67766/PREI2008_joueth­migstu.pdf (3.4.3018)
  • Roer-Strier, D. and Ben Ezra, D. 2006. Intermarriages between Western wom­en and Palestinian men: Multidirectional adaptation processes. Journal of Marriage and Family. 68 (1), pp. 41–55
  • Romano, D. 2008. Intercultural marriage: promises and pitfalls. Boston, MA: Intercultural Press.
  • Schwartz, S.H. 1992. Universals in the content and structure of values: The­ory and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. 25, pp. 1–65
  • Schwartz, S.H. 1994. Are there universal aspects in the content and structure of values? Journal of Social Issues. 50 (4), pp. 19–45.
  • Thomas, G. and James, D. 2006. Reinventing grounded theory: Some ques­tions about theory, ground and discovery. British Educational Research Journal. 32 (6), pp. 767–795.
  • Useem, R.H. and Cottrell, A.B. 1996. Adult Third Culture Kid. Strangers at Home: Essays on the Effects of Living Overseas and Coming “home” to a Strange Land. Aletheia Publication, pp. 22–35.

Wiadomość do:

 

 

© 2017 Adam Marszałek Publishing House. All rights reserved.

Projekt i wykonanie Pollyart