The roots of educational changes in the perspective of democracy challenges in Finland and England in the 20th century
- Institution: University of Łodź
- ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0713-8451
- Year of publication: 2021
- Source: Show
- Pages: 219-232
- DOI Address: https://doi.org/10.15804/em.2021.01.13
- PDF: em/14/em1413.pdf
This article presents Finnish educational changes in the context of The Nordic Model of Social Democracy improved since 1963 versus English model of Neoliberal Democracy based on conservatism since 1979 with its roots in the late eighteenth century in Europe. The reform of education in Finland was supported by a new curriculum and different methods of teaching. In 1963 students started to have an access to the highest-quality education and it was not related to students’ place of living, richness or annual income. On the other side in England, privatization and centralization were the main pillars of the reform with neoliberalism, neoconservatism and its market competition in education. The central government was responsible for the provision of educational services, educational policy, and planning the direction of the educational system. Teachers faced an ultimatum: “either submit to re-education or lose your job” (Jones, p. 43). The 1988 reform strengthened the ideological control of education and accelerated differentiation between schools.
REFERENCES:
- Aasen, P. 1999. Det sosialdemokratiske prosjektet. Utdanningsreformer i Sverige og Norge ietterkrigstiden [The social democratic project. Educational reforms in Sweden and Norway in the post-war period in Norwegian]. In: Telhaug A.O. and Aasen P. eds. 90-talletsutdanningsreformer i historisk perspektiv. Oslo, Norway: Cappelen Akademisk Forlag, pp. 13–64
- Andersen, T.M., Holmström, B., Honkapohja, S., Korkman, S., Söderström, H.T. and Vartiainen, J. 2007. The Nordic Model. Embracing globalization and sharing risks. Printed in Yliopistopaino.
- Apple, M.W. 1993. Critical introduction: ideology and state in educational policy. In: Dale, R. ed. The state and education policy. Milton Keynes: Open University Press, pp. 12–13.
- Brandal, N., Bratberg, Ø. and Thorsen, D.E. 2013. The Nordic Model of Social Democracy. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Giddens, A. 1990. The consequences of modernity. Oxford: Polity Press.
- Gutek, G.L. 2009. New perspectives on philosophy and education. New Jersey: Upper Saddle River.
- Heywood, A. 2002. Politics, second edition. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Dewey, J. 1939/2003. Freedom and culture. In: Boydston, J.A. ed. John Dewey: The later works 1925–1953. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, pp. 1938–1939.
- Englund, T. 2005. The discourse on equivalence in Swedish education policy. Journal of Education Policy. 20 (1), pp. 39–57.
- Englund, T. and Quennerstedt, A. 2008. Linking curriculum theory and linguistics: the performative use of “equivalence” as an educational policy concept. Curriculum Studies. 40 (6), pp. 713–724.
- Espinoza, O. 2007. Solving the equity-equality conceptual dilemma: a new mode for analysis of the educational process. Educational Research. 49 (4), pp. 343–363.
- Jones, K. 2003. Education in Britain 1944 to the present. Cambridge: Polity Press.
- Jyrhämä, R. and Maaranen, K. 2012. Research-orientation in a teacher’s work. In: Niemi, H., Toom, A. and Kallioniemi, A. eds. Miracle of education: The principles and teacher professional development in Finland practices of teaching and learning in Finnish schools. Rotterdam NL: Sense Publishers, pp. 97–110.
- Kwieciński, Z. 1997. Dylematy reform edukacyjnych w sytuacji gwałtownej zmiany ich kontekstu społecznego i kulturowego. In: Bogaj, A. ed. Realia i perspektywy reform oświatowych. Warszawa: IBE, pp. 9–16.
- McLaren, P. 1998. Revolution and reality. An interview with Carmel Borg, PeterMayo, Ronald Sultana. In: Pinar, W.F ed. Curriculum: Toward new identities. New York: Garland, pp. 354–376.
- Pinar, W.F. 2004. What is curriculum theory? Mahwah, New Jersey. London: Laurance Erlbaum Publishers.
- Potulicka, E. 1993. Nowa Prawica a edukacja. Cz. 1: Geneza reformy edukacji w Anglii i Walii z roku 1988. Poznań – Toruń: Edytor.
- Potulicka, E. and Rutkowiak, J. 2010. Neoliberalne uwikłania edukacji. Kraków: Oficyna Wydawnicza „Impuls”.
- Sahlberg, P. 2015. Finnish lessons. What can the world learn from educational change in Finland. New York: Columbia University.
- Schwille, J. and Dembélé, M. 2007. Global Perspectives on teacher Learning. Improving policy and practice. Paris: Unesco, International Institute for Educational Planning.
- Sejersted, F. 2004. Sosialdemokratiets tidsalder [The age of social democracy in Norwegian]. Nytt Norsk Tidsskrift. 21 (3–4), pp. 250–263.
- Sejersted, J.M. 2005. Debatta˚ret som ikkje var – 2004 [2004 – the year of the non-debate; in Norwegian]. In: Sejersted, J.M. and Vassenden, E. eds. Norsk litterær a˚rbok 2005. Oslo, Norway: Det Norske Samlaget, pp. 9–19.
- Simola, H. 2005. The Finnish miracle of PISA: historical and sociological remarks on teaching and teacher education. Comparative Education. 41 (4), pp. 455–470.
- Slagstad, R. 1998. De nasjonale strateger [National strategy makers; in Norwegian]. Oslo, Norway: Pax Forlag A/S.
- Suwalska, A, 2018. High-trust to teachers’ job in Finland in 1970s. Studia z Teorii Wychowania. 3 (24), pp. 273–287.
- Suwalska, A. 2017. English educational policy. Contemporary challenges in a historical-comparative context. Łodź – Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Jagiellonian University Press.
- Śliwerski, B. 2015. Edukacja (w) polityce, polityka (w) edukacji. Kraków: Oficyna Wydawnicza „Impuls”.
- Śpiewak, P. 1988. Konserwatywny pasztet. Res Publica. 11.
- Telhauga, A.O., Medias, O.A. and Aasen, P. 2006. The Nordic Model in Education: Education as part of the political system in the last 50 years. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research. 50 (3), pp. 245–283.
equity in education educational change neoconservatism roots of educational changes the Nordic Model of Social Democracy neoliberalism