Methodology that Comprises Students’ Analysis of Social Significance of Personal Conflict Behavior: Polish-Ukrainian Aspect
- Institution: University of Bialystok, Poland, National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine
- ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0682-5145
- Year of publication: 2024
- Source: Show
- Pages: 45-58
- DOI Address: https://doi.org/10.15804/kie.2024.04.03
- PDF: kie/146/kie14603.pdf
The article deals with the results of the psychopedagogical experiment to find Polish and Ukrainian aspects of implementing the analysis methodology of social significance of a personal conflict behavior, made by the students. The study has been applied with the use of the authorial pscyhopedagogical exercises “Vibrations: ‘Me in a Conflict’” and “Vibrations: ‘Me and the World’”. The exercises were developed on the basis of archaic and historical, bioenergetical, art-therapeutic and systematic approaches. The study tasks implied to engage student youth to realize a social significance of a personal conflict behavior. It was concluded that youth usually consider a social conflict as the one which “exists separately” as an independent “mechanism”. They often forget that a person is an element of a social system; a number of negative psychoemotional conflicting behavioral patterns (intrapersonal and interpersonal conflicts) make psychoemotional state of the World – a social conflict on a systemic approach. At the same time, students’ comprehension of this aspect is not the understanding and a direct definite change of the worldview and a personal conflict behavior. With free vibrations description on the models of the psychopedagogical, and experimentally proved, an individual subconsciously states the sense of the conflict-making problem as the fact that everything starts with us, our responsibility for the display of a personal conflict behavior that is an intrapersonal conflict. The students prove the assumption made in the beginning: social conflicts start with an intrapersonal and the transfer into an interpersonal conflict of every person, and a cultural difference makes its intensification. In spite of a significant influence of a cultural difference made by the students, this definite experiment didn’t show the difference in the analysis results of a personal conflict behavior performed by Polish and Ukrainian youth. Additionally, Polish and Ukrainian students unambiguously specified the developed psychopedgogical exercises of the analysis methodology of a social significance of a personal conflict behavior made by students, as effective ones. At the same time there appears an urgent need for intercultural education of the necessity to form a personal anti-conflict behavior based on a tolerant recognition “of people of different cultures, and different cultures in one person”.
REFERENCES:
- Adamus-Matuszyńska, A. (2019). Konflikt społeczny w świetle współczesnych teorii. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach.
- Beck, А., Davis, D., & Freeman, А. (2024). Cognitive Therapy of Personality Disorders. Naukovyi svit.
- Cialdini, R. (2017). Conviction: a Revolutional Method to Influence People. Trans. T. Mykytiuk. Klub simeinoho dozvillia.
- Coleman, P., Ferguson, R. (2016). Resultative Conflict. Trans. I. Sofiienko. Nash Format.
- Freud, Z. (2007). Psychoanalytical Sketches. Trans. D.I. Donskyi, V.F. Kruhlianskyi. Popurri.
- Galtung, Jo. (1969). Violence, Peace, and Peace Research. Journal of Peace Research, 6(3), 167–191.
- Honcharenko, S. (2010). Pedagogical Studies: Methodological Advices for Young Researchers. Planer.
- Khlivna, О., & Mahdysiuk, L. (2022). Psychology of Corporeality: reference book. VezhaDruk.
- Kozina A., & Pieczonka A. (2018). Strukturalne uwarunkowania konfliktów organizacyjnych. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, 543, 51‒62. DOI: 10.15611/pn.2018.543.07.
- Lowen, А. (2000). Body Psychology: Bio energetical Body Analysis. Institut obschegumanitarnyh issledovanii.
- Nikitorowicz, J. (2015). Wyzwania i zadania współczesnego uniwersytetu z perspektywy edukacji międzykulturowej. Rocznik Lubuski, 41(2), 51–62.
- Ortega y Gasset, J. (1990). Two Big Metaphors. Theory of Metaphors: a collection. In N. Arutunovoy & M. Arutunovoy (Eds.). Progress.
- Osadchenko, І. (2023). Analysis of a Personal Responsibility Comprehension for Interpersonal and Social Conflicts (based on the authorial psychological exercises). Humanitarni studii: pedahohika, psykholohiia, filosofiia, 14(3), 191–203. DOI: 10.31548/hspedagog14(3).2023.191–203.
- Pleskach, В. (2018). Methodology to Diagnose of an Interpersonal Conflict. Digital Library NAES of Ukraine, 1, 3–7.
- Shapar, V. (2007). Modern Explanatory Psychological Dictionary. Prapor.
- Shylov, Y. (2023). Noospheric Theory of the History and problems of the Present Time. In А.P. Samodryna (Ed.), Research Laboratory for the Study and Development of the Humanitarian Ideas of Academician V.I. Vernadskyi. Museum “Ancient Aratta – Ukraine”.
- Słaboń, A. (2014). Konflikty społeczne w doświadczeniu młodzieży małego miasta, Start, 7(931), 79–93.
- Vygotsky, L. (1983). Mind and Speech. Pedagogika. V. 2.
- Zhovtianska, V. (2009). Psychological Mechanism of a Metaphor Functioning. Psykholohia i suspilstvo, 3, 81–90.
intrapersonal conflict personal conflict behavior interpersonal conflict cultural difference conflict social conflict