Probability of Global Threats and Strength of Their Potential Impact on Poland as Assessed by Students of Pedagogy over the Period 2018–2022

  • Author: Arleta Hrehorowicz
  • Institution: Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Poland
  • ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1656-5252
  • Author: Błażej Przybylski
  • Institution: The Maria Grzegorzewska University, Poland
  • ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0663-8692
  • Author: Rafał Boguszewski
  • Institution: Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Poland
  • ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1831-4265
  • Year of publication: 2024
  • Source: Show
  • Pages: 79-100
  • DOI Address: https://doi.org/10.15804/kie.2024.04.05
  • PDF: kie/146/kie14605.pdf

The article is a presentation of the results of our own research. Global threats were made the key research category, the characteristics of which are listed and described in the text. A procedure of our own research is presented in the article and the results obtained are analysed and interpreted. The aim of the research was to find out opinions on the probability of the occurrence of global threats and the strength of their potential impact on the social order in Poland in a ten-year perspective. The research was carried out by means of a diagnostic survey with the use of an original survey questionnaire. Three waves of the survey were conducted: in 2018, 2020 and 2022. The article identifies differences in the assessment of specific threats and their types in successive waves of the survey. From 2020 onwards, the highest rating is given to the probability and strength of the potential impact of economic risks on Poland. A systematic increase in the overall rating of the probability of occurrence and strength of the potential impact of threats on the country’s social order has also been documented.

REFERENCES:

  • Barke, R.P., Jenkins-Smith, H., & Slovic, P. (1997). Risk perceptions of men and women scientists. Social Science Quarterly, 78(1), 167–176.
  • Bauman, Z. (2008). Płynne czasy. Życie w epoce niepewności. Wydawnictwo Sic!
  • Bilgin, A., Radziemska, M., & Fronczyk, J. (2016). Determination of Risk Perceptions of University Students and Evaluating Their Environmental Awareness in Poland. Cumhuriyet Science Journal, 37(4), pp. 418–425.
  • Boni, M. (2021). Młodzi 2020 – w poszukiwaniu tożsamości. Raport. Fundacja im. Stefana Batorego.
  • Carducci, A., Fiore, M., Azara, A. et al. (2019). Environment and health: Risk perception and its determinants among Italian university students. Science of the Total Environment, 691, pp. 1162–1172.
  • Chlewiński, Z. (1995). What do the young people think about the possibility to solve the problems of the contemporary world in the future? An introductory report. Journal for Mental Changes. Perspective of Economic. Political and Social Integration, 2(1), pp. 123–128.
  • Cottle, S. (2009). Global crisis reporting. Open University Press.
  • Csobanka, Z.E. (2016). The Z Generation. Acta Technologica Dubnicae, 6(2), 63–76.
  • Cywiński, P., Ziółkowski, J., & Katner, F. (2019). Zarządzanie strachem: jak prawica wygrywa debatę publiczną w Polsce. Fundacja im. Stefana Batorego.
  • Deloitte (2022). Raport Global 2022 Gen Z & Millennial Survey. https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/pl/Documents/Reports/pl_deloitte_2022_genz_millennial_survey.pdf
  • Deloitte (2021). Global 2021 Millennial and Gen Z Survey. https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/mk/Documents/about-deloitte/2021-deloitte-global-millennialsurvey-report.pdf
  • Deloitte (2020). Global Millennial Survey 2020. https://www2.deloitte.com/pl/pl/pages/human-capital/articles/raport-millenialsi-2020.html
  • Deloitte (2019). Global Millennial Survey 2019. https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/global/Documents/About-Deloitte/deloitte-2019-millennial-survey.pdf
  • Długosz, P. (2021). Trauma pandemii COVID-19 w polskim społeczeństwie. CeDeWu.
  • Dolot, A. (2018). The characteristic of Generation Z. E-mentor, 74(2), 45–50.
  • Glogger, I., & Shehata, A. (2022) Bridging the gap: Introducing a socio-cultural dimension to explain beliefs about man-made threats. Public Understanding of Science, 31(8), pp. 1063–1078. DOI: 10.1177/09636625221095723
  • Gustafsod, P.E. (1998). Gender Differences in Risk Perception: Theoretical and Methodological perspectives. Risk Analysis, 18(6), 805–811.
  • Half, R. (2015). Get Ready for Generation Z. https://www.roberthalf.com/blog/the-futureof-work/get-ready-for-generation-z
  • Hołyst, B. (2013). Zagrożenia ładu społecznego. T. 1–2. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
  • Hough, P. (2004). Understanding Global Security. Routledge.
  • Hysa, B. (2016). Zarządzanie różnorodnością pokoleniową. Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie, 97, pp. 387–398.
  • IPSOS (2022). The World’s response to the war in Ukraine. Retrieved: https://www.ipsos.com/sites/default/files/ct/news/documents/2022-04/Global%20Advisor%20-%20War%20in%20Ukraine%20-%20April%202022%20-%20Graphic%20Report.pdf?fbclid=IwAR1p53yOagtK6_lrBPOHwIroCUI4EixmbyZyv0fCQkKFPzZli8EUNWZyGE4
  • Kasprzycki, D.D. (2022). Konflikt zbrojny na Ukrainie w kontekście rosyjskiej koncepcji wojny nowej generacji. Rocznik Bezpieczeństwa Międzynarodowego, 1, pp. 79–107.
  • Kleer, J. (2012). Zagrożenia globalne: próba identyfikacji. Przyszłość. Świat – Europa – Polska, 2, 14–29.
  • Kwiecińska-Zdrenka. M., & Kwieciński. Z. (2000). Lęk i edukacja wobec przyszłości świata. In: Z. Kwieciński (ed.). Tropy – ślady – próby. Studia i szkice z pedagogiki pogranicza (pp. 217–232). Wydawnictwo Edytor.
  • Laboratorium Badań Wojny w Ukrainie (2022). Badanie wśród Polaków na temat wojennej traumy. https://www.rp.pl/spoleczenstwo/art37986811-badanie-mocny-lek-polakowprzed-wojna-i-uchodzcami-do-walki-stanelaby-jedna-piata-badanych
  • Lazo, J.K., Kinnell, J.C., & Fisher, A. (2000). Expert and Layperson Perceptions of Ecosystem Risk. Risk Analysis, 20(2), pp. 179–193.
  • Łączyński, M., Sztyber, M., Kowalczyk, G. et al. (2022). Wojna w Ukrainie w opinii Polaków. sondaż telefoniczny LBM UW. https://www.lbm.uw.edu.pl/images/wojna_w_ukrainie_w_opinii_polakow.pdf
  • Martin, H.P., & Schumann, H. (2000). Pułapka globalizacji. Atak na demokrację i dobrobyt. Wydawnictwo Dolnośląskie.
  • McNeil, H. (2018). Gen Z learning tendencies: A call for next-gen learning platforms. Training. https://trainingmag.com/gen-z-learning-tendencies-a-call-for-next-genlearning-platforms/
  • PRC (Pew Research Center) (2019). Climate Change Still Seen as the Top Global Threat. but
  • Cyberattacks a Rising Concern. https://www.pewresearch.org/global/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2019/02/Pew-Research-Center_Global-Threats-2018-Report_2019-02-10.pdf
  • Przybylski, B., Janeczko, E., Studnicki, M., Bielinis, E., & Bielinis, L. (2022). Young adults’ perspective of global environmental risks: A study on Polish university students. PLoS ONE, 17(9).
  • Seemiller, C., & Grace, M. (2015). Generation Z Goes to College. Jossey-Bass.
  • Stróżyk, A. (2021). Pandemia koronawirusa na świecie i w Polsce – kalendarium. https://www.medicover.pl/o-zdrowiu/pandemia-koronawirusa-na-swiecie-i-w-polscekalendarium.7252.n.192
  • Strzelecki, Z. (2012). Główne zagrożenia globalne dla Polski. Przyszłość. Świat-EuropaPolska, 2, 43–50.
  • Szafraniec, K. (2022). Pokolenia i polskie zmiany. 45 lat badań wzdłuż czasu. PWN.
  • Tulgan, B. (2009). Not Everyone Gets A Trophy: How to Manage Generation Y. JosseyBass.
  • Turner, A.R. (2015). Generation Z: Technology and Social Interest. The Journal of Individual Psychology, 71(2), 103–113.
  • Urry, J. (2016). What is the Future? Polity Press.
  • WEF (World Economic Forum) (2018). The Global Risks Report 2018. 13th Edition. Geneva. www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GRR18_Report.pdf
  • Welzer, H. (2010). Wojny klimatyczne. Wydawnictwo Krytyki Politycznej.
  • White, J.E. (2017). Meet Generation Z: Understanding and Reaching the New PostChristian World. Baker Publishing Group.

global threats risk academic youth future pedagogy

Wiadomość do:

 

 

© 2017 Adam Marszałek Publishing House. All rights reserved.

Projekt i wykonanie Pollyart