• facebook

Co polacy mają wspólnego z „Milczeniem Owiec”? „Bestie” na wolności a ich „Uczłowieczenie”. Zarys analityczno-syntetyczny problemu

  • Author: Kazimierz Pierzchała
  • Institution: Wyższa Szkoła Gospodarki Krajowej w Kutnie
  • Year of publication: 2014
  • Source: Show
  • Pages: 63-73
  • DOI Address: http://dx.doi.org/10.15804/ksm201405
  • PDF: ksm/19/ksm201405.pdf

Convicted of dangerous (status “N”):

1) Subjective criteria. The embedded person is identified as a “N”, whose behawior at the offence, personal conditions, the type and size of the negative consequences of crime, motivations, the way of proceeding during the stay in prison, the degree of demoralization carry important social threat or serious danger to the plant.

2) Subject criteria, referring to the type of crime committed by the embedded person (crime with particular cruelty or use of firearms). The list of offenses is open.

The status “N” can also be obtained for especially reprehensible behavior during previous imprisonment. The list of offenses is closed (he was the perpetrator of rape, grievous bodily harm, or abused inmates).

category humanization parliamentary act convicted of dangerous beast embedded prisoners rehabilitation

Wiadomość do:

 

 

© 2017 Adam Marszałek Publishing House. All rights reserved.

Projekt i wykonanie Pollyart