• facebook
Author: Jarosław Nocoń
Institution: University of Gdańsk (Poland)
Year of publication: 2015
Source: Show
Pages: 9–22
DOI Address: http://dx.doi.org/10.15804/ppsy2015002
PDF: ppsy/44/ppsy2015002.pdf

In article, author pay attention to the potential and scope of the impact of new forms of communication on the form and content of theoretical research. In principle, such an effect can be seen in two related, but different dimensions of analysis. In the first place it concerns the scope of the political theory, which is enriched with new areas and issues revealing previously unknown or not perceived problems, phenomena and processes that guide the interests of contemporary researchers. On the other hand, global mass communication techniques significantly shape, and thus change the existing forms of theoretical discourse and the structure of the theory itself. These changes in the perspective of plurality and decentralization of theoretical discourse subjects, as well as the emergence of new research areas which aspire to the status of scientific discipline, gain innovative importance especially from the point of view of the attempts to achieve meta-synthetic accumulation of social knowledge.

References:

  • Adcock, R., Bevir, M. Stimson, P. M. (2007). A History of Political Science, How? What? Why? In R. Adcock, M. Bevir, C. Stimson (Eds.), Modern Political Science: Anglo-American Exchanges Since 1880. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Almond, G. A. (1990). A Discipline Divided: Schools and Sects in Political Science. London: Sage Publications.
  • Andrews, D. C. (1999). A Participatory Approach to Communication for Developing Countries. In P. J. Hager, H. J. Scheiber (Eds.), Managing Global Communication in Science and Techology. New York: Wiley-Interscience Publication.
  • Bell, W. (2003). Foundations of Futures Studies. Human Science for a New Era, 1, 164–168.
  • Bohman, J. (2004). Discourse Theory. In G. F. Gaus, C. Kukathas, (Eds.), Handbook of Political Theory. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
  • Chakravartty, P., & Zhao, Y. (2007). Toward a Transcultural Political Economy of Global Communications. In P. Chakravartty, Y. Zhao (Eds.), Global Communications. Toward a Transcultural Political Economy (p. 4–7). Boulder: Rownam&Littlefield Publishers.
  • Coats, W. J. (2003). Political Theory and Practice, Eight Esseys on a Theme. Selinsgrove: Susquehanna University Press.
  • Crotty, W. J. (1991). Introduction: Setting the Stage. In W. J. Crotty (Ed.), Political Science: Looking to the Future (p. 1–3). Illinois: Northwestern University Press.
  • DeLeon, P., Vogenbeck, D. M. (2007). The Policy Sciences at the Crossroads, In: Handbook of Public Policy. Theory, Policy, and Methods. In F. Fischer, G. J. Miller, M. Sidney (Eds.), New York: CRC Press.
  • Ellis, D. G. (2007) Transforming Conflict: Communication and Ethnopolitical Conflict. Lanham: Rowmann & Littlefield Publishing Group.
  • Giddens, A. (1987) Social Theory and Modern Sociology. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • Golinowski, J. (2007). Perspektywa porządku postpolitycznego. W stronę technologii władzy. Warszawa: Elipsa.
  • Held, D. (2006). Democracy: From City–states to Cosmopolitan Order? In E Goodin, P. Pettit, eds. Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Anthology (p. 78–100). London: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Jonkisz, A. (1998). Kłopoty z postępem. Forum Akademickie, 2.
  • Lassman, P. (1989). Introduction: Politics and Social Theory. In P. Lassman (Ed.), Politics and Social Theory. New York: Routledge.
  • Luhmann, N. (1994). Teoria polityczna państwa bezpieczeństwa socjalnego. Warszawa: wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
  • Nocoń, J. (2009). Teoria polityczna w perspektywie postpozytywistycznej. Athenaeum. Polskie Studia Politologiczne, 22.
  • Nocoń, J. (2010). Między tradycją a modernizacją. Przeobrażenia badań politologicznych w świetle neofunkcjonalizmu Jeffreya C. Alexandra. Bydgoszcz: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Kazimierza Wielkiego.
  • Stankiewicz, W.J. (2003) Niezbędność teorii politycznej. Klasyczne pojęcia w dobie relatywizmu, Wrocław: Ossolineum.
  • Stehr, N. (2005). Knowledge Politics: Governing the Consequences of Science and Technology (p. 49–56). Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.
  • Wallerstein, I. (1990). Societal Development or Development of the World System? In M. Albrow, E. King (Eds.), Globalization, Knowledge and Society (p. 157–171). London: Sage Publication.
  • Wallerstein, I. (2001). Unthinking Social Science: The Limits of Nineteenth Century Paradigms. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

 

 

Wiadomość do:

 

 

© 2017 Adam Marszałek Publishing House. All rights reserved.

Projekt i wykonanie Pollyart

Korzystając z naszej strony, wyrażasz zgodę na wykorzystywanie przez nas plików cookies . Zaktualizowaliśmy naszą politykę przetwarzania danych osobowych (RODO). Więcej o samym RODO dowiesz się tutaj.