Assessing State Support for the Development of International Economic Cooperation: a Case of Polish Trade Support Institutions’ Export Recommendations for Turkey

Author: Oskar J. Chmiel
Institution: University of Wrocław (Poland)
Year of publication: 2018
Source: Show
Pages: 39–53
DOI Address:
PDF: ppsy/47-1/ppsy2018103.pdf

In times of increasing significance for national policies which support international economic cooperation, a special role is played by state trade support institutions (TSIs). This paper investigates whether such TSIs can be said to operate effectively, through an analysis of one essential element of the support provided to domestic entrepreneurs, namely export recommendations. The recommendations provided by Polish TSIs in respect of Turkey is employed as a case study. The theory of comparative advantage along with a neo-institutional perspective provide the conceptual framing for this analysis, in conjunction with both desk research, document analysis, and selected economic indices. Factors such as trade potential, comparative advantages, and the competitiveness of selected product groups exported by Polish firms to Turkey were also taken into account. The findings largely indicate that TSI export recommendations are adequate, and the majority of the recommended industries demonstrated considerable sales opportunities. Nevertheless, some discrepancies were also noted, which should be an issue for further investigation by both researchers and TSI analysts. Furthermore, the case study in this paper demonstrates that the choices within economic promotion policy – despite its partition between variously-oriented TSIs - were made on the basis of economic rationality.



  • Balassa, B. (1965). “Trade liberalisation and revealed comparative advantage”. The Manchester School, 33(2), pp. 99–123.
  • Bidzińska, G. (2009). “Sektor drzewny i jego specyfika”. In E. Ratajczak (Ed.), Innowacyjność sektora drzewnego w Polsce (pp. 61–67). Poznań: Instytut Technologii Drewna.
  • Brewer, P. (2009). “Australia's Export Promotion Program: Is It Effective?”. Australian Journal of Management, 34(1), pp. 125–142.
  • Elman, P. (2013). “A Partnership between Poland and Turkey: Filling the EU Gap?”. PISM Bulletin, 54 (507).
  • Erdoğan to visit Poland to boost trade ties (2017, October 14), Hurriyet Daily News. Retrieved from:
  • Faroque, A. R., & Takahashi, Y. (2012). “The Impact of Export Assistance on “Born Globals”: An Integrative Network Perspective”. In A. R. Faroque & Y. Takahashi (Eds.), Export Assistance: The Way Back and Forward (pp. 25–68). New York: Springer.
  • Gencturk, E. F., & Kotabe, M. (2001). “The effect of export assistance program usage on export performance: A contingency explanation”. Journal of International Marketing, 9(2), pp. 51–72.
  • Hirsch, M. (2013). “The Politics of Rules of Origin”. The International Law Forum of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem Law Faculty. Research Paper No. 08–13.
  • Investment Support and Promotion Agency of Turkey. (2013). The Iron and Steel Industry in Turkey. Retrieved from:
  • Karaalp, H., & Yilmaz, N. (2012). “Assessment of Trends in the Comparative Advantage and Competitiveness of the Turkish Textile and Clothing Industry in the Enlarged EU Market”. Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe, 20, 3(92), pp. 8–11.
  • Koszewska, M. (2005). “International Competitiveness of the Polish Protective Clothing Manufacturers in Face of European Integration”. Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe, 13, 4(52), p. 11.
  • Lederman, D., Olarreaga, M., & Payton, L. (2006). Export Promotion Agencies: What Works and What Doesn’t (Policy Research Working Paper. No. 4044). Washington, DC: World Bank.
  • Liesch, P., & Knight, G. (1999). “Information internalization and hurdle rates in small and medium enterprise internationalization”. Journal of International Business Studies, 3(2), pp. 383–394.
  • Market Analysis and Research Division of Market Development/International Trade Centre. (2014).  Trade Map User Guide: Trade statistics for international business development. Retrieved from:
  • Mierzwa, J. (2015). “Polish-Turkish relations in the 19th and 20th centuries: The struggle for independence and modernization”. Journal of Economics and Management, 20(A), pp. 5-21.
  • Olaru, O-L. (2014). “Trade Promotion Organizations (TPOs) Role in Laying the Groundwork for an Export Promotion Program”. Global Economic Observer, 2(1), pp.163–169.
  • Öniş, Z., & Kutlay, M. (2017). “The dynamics of emerging middle-power influence in regional and global governance: the paradoxical case of Turkey”. Australian Journal Of International Affairs, 71(2).
  • Pawlak, M. (2014). “Foreign Policy as Part of Strengthening the Polish Economy in the World: the Ethical Aspect”. Annales. Ethics in Economic Life, 17(4), pp. 93–100.
  • PBS Polska. (2014). Jak zdobywać rynki zagraniczne. Badanie Fundacji Kronenberga przy Citi Handlowy zrealizowane przy współpracy merytorycznej. Retrieved from:
  • Polsko-Turecka Izba Gospodarcza. (2013). Przewodnik rynkowy dla przedsiębiorców - Turcja. Retrieved from:
  • Puślecki, Z.W. (2017). “Current Trends in Foreign Trade Theory and Policy”. Polish Political Science Yearbook, 46(2), pp. 135–149. DOI:
  • Rosen, H. (2003). “Free Trade Agreements as Foreign Policy Tools: The US-Israel and US-Jordan FTAs”. In J. J. Schott (Ed.), Free Trade Agreements: US Strategies and Priorities (pp. 51–79). Washington, D.C: Institute for International Economics,
  • Salamaga, M. (2010). “Konkurencyjność eksportu krajów Unii Europejskiej”. Wiadomości Statystyczne, 5, pp. 78–92.
  • Sirtioglu, I. (2010). Forest Products Report for Turkey. Istanbul: GAIN. Retrieved from:
  • The World Bank (2010). Trade indicators. Retrieved from:
  • The World Bank (2013).  Online Trade Outcomes Indicators - User’s Manual. Retrieved from:
  • Think Tank (2014). Analiza think tank i HSBC Turcja – perspektywy dla polskich firm. Retrieved from:
  • Todaro, M.P., & Smith, S.C. (2006). Economic Development (9th ed.). Boston: Addison-Wesley.
  • Turkish Steel Producers Association. (n.d.). Turkish Steel Industry in 2015. Retrieved from:
  • Utkulu, U., & Seymen, D. (2004). Revealed Comparative Advantage and Competitiveness: Evidence for Turkey vis-à-vis the EU/15. Paper presented at the European Trade Study Group 6th Annual Conference, ETSG 2004, Nottingham.
  • Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism - Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting. New York: Free Press.
  • Wróblewska, J. (n.d.). Materiał informacyjny na posiedzenie Komisji Gospodarki Narodowej Senatu RP w sprawie efektywności promowania polskiej gospodarki w świecie. Department of Economic Diplomacy of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Poland. Retrieved from:
  • Wysokińska, Z. (2010). Ekspertyza nt. Potencjalnych obszarów i dziedzin przewag konkurencyjnych gospodarki polskiej. Warszawa: Uniwersytet Łódzki.
  • Yılmaz, B. (2003). “Turkey’s Competitiveness in the European Union: A Comparison with Five Candidate Countries – Bulgaria, The Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Romania – and the EU15”.  Eastward Enlargement of the Euro-zone Working Papers, 12.
  • Zaborowski, M., Zielińska-Rakowicz, A., & Gradziuk, A. (2014). Promocja polskiej gospodarki za granicą. Warszawa: Polski Instytut Spraw Międzynarodowych.


institutional coherence international competitiveness international entrepreneurship foreign market information trade support institutions Turkey Poland

Wiadomość do:



© 2017 Adam Marszałek Publishing House. All rights reserved.

Projekt i wykonanie Pollyart