Methodological concept of the research of criminal and legal support against corruption bribery in Ukraine

The article presents the methodological concept of the study of criminal law support for combating corruption bribery in Ukraine. At the same time, the study of criminal liability for corruption bribery should be based on an appropriate methodological basis. Successful choice of methods of scientific knowledge has a direct impact not only on the research process but also on its results. To obtain reliable conclusions, it is unconditional to use the widest possible methodological tools, taking into account the peculiarities and specifics of the field of research. The protection of human rights in Ukraine today is inextricably connected with combating such a negative phenomenon as corruption. This thesis is declared by a number of international legal agreements, laws and regulations of Ukraine. The European standards of combating corruption in the paradigm of the rule of law exactly allow to increase the effectiveness of the efforts of the Ukrainian society in this direction. The above allows us to formulate a methodological concept for the study of criminal law support for combating corruption bribery in Ukraine. Research of criminal liability for corruption bribery should be carried out from the standpoint of a binary approach:

1. To find out the cause and conditions of occurrence, as well as certain characteristics of the phenomenon itself – deviant behavior in the form of corrupt bribery.
2. To develop the concept of criminal law counteraction to corruption bribery and development of substantiated scientific recommendations on the construction and content of relevant criminal law norms-prohibitions.

At the same time, the theory of social naturalism should be chosen as the primary source of worldviews for the study of criminal liability for corruption bribery. This will allow developing new concepts for the formation of law-abiding behavior in the anti-corruption sphere by reassessing the means of legal regulation, partial rejection of positivist principles and the introduction of natural – naturalistic approaches to the formation of criminal law.

REFERENCES:

• Demydova, L. (2015). Kryminalne pravo v zahalnii systemi naukovykh znan: metodolohichnyi aspekt kryminalno-pravovykh doslidzhen [Criminal law in the general system of scientific knowledge: methodological aspect of criminal law research]. Yurydychnyi visnyk, no. 3 (36), pp. 139-143.
• Kerymov, D. (2001). Metodolohyia prava (predmet, funktsyy, problemы fylosofyy prava) [Methodology of law (subject, functions, problems of philosophy of law)]. Moscow: Avanta. [in Russian]
• Kostenko, O. (2006-2007.) Sotsialnyi naturalizm yak metodolohichnyi pryntsyp filosofii prava [Social naturalism as a methodological principle of philosophy of law]. Problemy filosofii prava, no. IV-V, pp. 98-106.
• Kostytskyi, M. (2013). Deiaki pytannia metodolohii yurydychnoi nauky [Some questions of methodology of legal science]. Retrieved from: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Nvknuvs_2013_1_3.
• Panov, M. (2017). Osnovy metodolohii nauky kryminalnoho prava [Fundamentals of the methodology of the science of criminal law]. Retrieved from: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/vakpu_2017_2_3.
• Panov, M. (2018). Problemy metodolohii nauky kryminalnoho prava: vybrani naukovi pratsi [Problems of the methodology of science of criminal law: selected scientific works]. Kharkiv: Pravo. [in Ukrainian]
• Serdiuk, O. (2010). Sotsiolohichnyi pidkhid u suchasnomu pravoznavstvi: filososkopravove doslidzhennia [Sociological approach in modern jurisprudence: philosophical and legal researches]. (Dr.Sc. (Juridical) Thesis). Kharkiv: Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University.