A UK Study of Thinking and Language Expression

The study assessed children’s ability to develop narratives and express ideas. It comprised 120 children (5-10 years), and differences in relation to age, sex, and economic area were measured. To this end, we compared four schools in 2 economic areas (poor and average). We used 2 picture and 2 story re-telling tasks designed to elicit narrations reflecting the generation of ideas in response to visual and auditory stimuli. Significant differences for age and sex but not economic areas were found. Suggestions are made for balancing brain activity and developing more creative approaches in teaching and assessment.

REFERENCES:

• Bertling, J., Rojas, N., Alegre, J., & Faherty, K. (2020). A tool to capture learning experiences during COVID-19: The PISA Global Crises Questionnaire Module. OECD Education Working Paper 232. https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9988df4e-en
• Di Caro, B. (2021). Global technology. Governance Summit. GYGS21 WEF.
• Dolcos, S., Albarracin, D. (2014). The inner speech of behavioral regulation: Intentions and task performance strengthen when you talk to yourself as a You. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 636–642. DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.2048
• Halpern, D. & LaMay, M. (2000). The smarter sex: A critical review of sex differences in intelligence. Educational Psychology Review, 12(2), 229–246.
• Hurlbert, R. (2007). Describing inner experience? Proponent meets skeptic. MIT Press.
• Kaczmarek B.L.J. (2018). Application of Lurian approach to assessment of perpetrators of crimes The Fifth International Luria Memorial Congress «Lurian Approach in International Psychological Science», KnE Life Sciences, 408–416. doi: 10.18502/kls.v4i8.3299.
• Kaczmarek, B.L.J., & Stencel, M. (2018). Third mode of thinking. The New Educational Review, 53(3), 285–296. DOI: 10.15804/tner.2018.53.3.24
• Kaplan, D. (2019) Creativity in education: Teaching for creativity development. Psychology, 10, 140-147. DOI: 10.4236/psych.2019.102012
• Liu, J., Peng, P., & Zhao, B. (2022). Socioeconomic status and academic achievement in primary and secondary education: a  meta-analytic review. Educational Psychology Review. DOI: 10.1007/s10648-022-09689-y
• Lucas, B. and E. Spencer (2017). Teaching creative thinking: Developing learners who generate ideas and can think critically. Crown House Publishing.
• Minor, K., Willits, J., Marggraf, M., Jones, M., & Lysaker, P. (2019). Measuring disorganized speech in schizophrenia: Automated analysis explains variance in cognitive deficits beyond clinician-rated scales. Psychological Medicine, 49(3), 440–448. DOI: 10.1017/S0033291718001046
• Murnikov, V., & Kask, K. (2021). Recall accuracy in children: Age vs. conceptual thinking. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.686904
• Nuffield Research Project on Motivation. (n.d.). https://www.nuffieldfoundation.org/sites/default/files/files/Practitioner%20report_1.pdf
• Parsons, S., & Branagan, A. (2016). Language for thinking: A structured approach for young children. Routledge.
• Pavese, C. (2021). Knowledge how. In  E. N. Zalta  (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2021/entries/knowledge-how
• Ren, Y., & Shen, F. (2022). Effects of narratives and behavioral involvement on adolescents’ attitudes toward gaming disorder. Health Communication, 37(6), 657–667. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2020.1862397
• Sage, L. (2014). Why motivation? An Achievement Goal perspective to research and teaching. Education Today, 64(3).
• Sage, R. (2000). Class talk: successful learning through effective communication. Bloomsbury.
• Sage, R. (2020). Speechless: Issues for education. Buckingham University Press.
• Sage, R., & Mattuecci, R. (2022a). How world events are changing education. Brill Academic Publishers.
• Sage, R., & Mattuecci, R. (2022b). Technology and learning: How teaching can be changed for 21st century requirements. In Press.
• Sirin, S.  R. (2005). Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A  meta-analytic review of research. Review of Educational Research, 75(3), 417–453. DOI: 10.3102/00346543075003417
• Spencer, T. D., & Petersen, D. B. (2020). Narrative intervention: principles to practice. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 51(4), 1081–1096. https://doi.org/10.1044/2020_LSHSS-20-00015
• Tam, G., & El-Azar, D. (2020). 3 Ways the Coronavirus Pandemic Could Reshape Education. World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/03/3-ways-coronavirus-is-reshapingeducation-and-what-changes-might-be-here-to-stay
• Thomson, S. (2018). Achievement at school and socioeconomic background – an educational perspective. Npj Sci. of Learning, 3. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-018-0022-0
• United Nations. (2020). The future we want, the United Nations we need: Update on the work of the Office on the Commemoration of the UN’s 75th Anniversary. https://report.un75.online/files/report/un75-report-september-en.pdf
• Üskül, A., & Oishi, S. (2018). Socio-economic environment and human psychology: Social, ecological, and cultural perspectives. Oxford University Press.
• Vygotsky, L. (1962). Thought and language. MIT Press.
• Wagoner, B. (2012). Notes on a social psychology of thinking: A comparison of Bartlett and Moscovici. Papers on Social Representations, 21(1), 6.1–6.14. http://www.psych.lse.ac.uk/psr/
• Wallentin, M. (2009). Putative sex differences in verbal abilities and language cortex: a critical review. Brain and language, 108(3), 175–183. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2008.07.001
• World Bank (2019). The Education crisis: Being in school is not the same as learning. https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/immersive-story/2019/01/22/pass-or-fail-howcan-the-world-do-its-home