Measuring Creativity Using the Test of Creative Imagination (TCI). Part 1. Presentation of a New Instrument to Measure Creative Potential
- Institution: Academy of Special Education, Warsaw, Poland
- Year of publication: 2008
- Source: Show
- Pages: 44-53
- DOI Address: https://doi.org/10.15804/tner.08.14.1.03
- PDF: tner/200801/tner1403.pdf
There are many controversies with the psychometric approach to study human creativity. Many scholars doubt it is possible to discover something as delicate as creativity using standardized tests (eg Baer, 1993/1994, Hocevar, 1981). However, research shows that creativity tests are valid, reliable and predictive (Plucker, 1999, Plucker, Runco, 1998, Plucker, Renzulli, 1999). The article presents a new instrument to measure creative potential – especially creative imagination. This instrument called TCI – Test of Creative Imagination – looks effective, culture-fair, reliable and valid, which makes it useful for an individual diagnosis of creativity as well as for scientific studies
REFERENCES:
- Baer, J. (1993/1994). Why you shouldn’t trust creativity test. Educational Leadership, 51(4), 80–83.
- Hocevar, D. (1981). Measurement of Creativity: Review and Critique. Journal of Personality Assessment, 45(5), 450–460.
- Finke, R., Ward, T. & Smith, S. (1992). Creative cognition. Cambridge, MT: MIT.
- Plucker, J.A. & Runco, M.A. (1998). The death of creativity measurement has been greatly exaggerated: current issues, recent advances, and future directions in creativity assessment. Roeper Review, 21, 36–39.
- Plucker, J.A. (1999). Is the Proof in the Pudding? Reanalyzes of Torrance’s (1958 to Present) Longitudinal Data. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 2, 103-114.
- Plucker, J.A. & Renzulli, J.S. (1999). Psychometric Apporaches to the Study of Human Creativity. In R.J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.