Reflections of English Language Teachers Concerning Computer Assisted Language Learning (Call)

This paper reports on the study undertaken to investigate the reflections of English language teachers towards computer assisted language learning and the associated problems and constraints faced by them. The study is qualitative and quantitative in nature and involved 32 English language teachers from 7 primary schools in Novi Sad, Serbia. The findings revealed that the majority of the teachers had a positive attitude, were highly motivated towards the use of computers to teach English and actually used them for teaching and learning purposes. The findings also revealed that intrinsic rewards, such as responsibilities, a sense of self-worth and accomplishments, played an important role in enhancing the positive attitude and motivation.

REFERENCES:

• Blumefeld, P.C. (1992). Classroom learning and motivation: clarifying and expanding goal theory, Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 3, 272–281.
• Bolton, D. (2006). Exemplary Uses of Technology in Education, The New Educational Review. Vol.10, 227–244.
• Cox, MJ, Preston, C and Cox, K (1999). What Factors Support or Prevent Teachers from Using ICT in Their Classrooms?, Paper presented at the BERA 1999 Conference, Brighton, UK, Sept 2–9.
• Dalgarno, B. (2001). Interpretations of constructivism and consequences for Computer Assisted Learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32(2), 183–194.
• Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P. and Warshaw, P.R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models, Management Science, 35, 8, 982–1003.
• Davies, G. (2005). Computer Assisted Language Learning: Where are we now and where are we going? Keynote speech at the University of Ulster Centre for Research in Applied Languages UCALL conference: ‘‘Developing a pedagogy for CALL’’, 13–15 June 2005, University of Ulster at Coleraine.
• Dilworth, M. (1991). Motivation, Rewards and Incentives, Washington D.C: Office of Education Research and Improvement, ERIC Clearinghouse on Teacher Education, 3, pp.238–239.
• Ellis, R. (1999). Learning a Second Language through Interaction, Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
• Felix, U. (2003). An orchestrated vision of language learning online. In U. Felix (Ed.), Language Learning Online: Towards Best Practice (pp. 7–18). Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
• Heift , T. (2001). Error-Specific and Individualized Feedback in a Web-based Language Tutoring System: Do They Read It? ReCALL 13(2), 129–142.
• Heift , T. & M. Schulze (2007). Errors and Intelligence in Computer-Assisted Language Learning: Parsers and Pedagogues. Routledge.
• Holliday, L. (1999). Theory and research: Input, interaction, and CALL. In J. Egbert & E. Hanson-Smith (Eds), CALL environments: Research, practice, and critical issues (pp. 181–188). Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
• Hubbard, P. and M. Levy (2006). Teacher Education in CALL. John Benjamins: Philadelphia, USA.
• Kukulska-Hulme, A., Traxler, J. (2005). Mobile teaching and learning. In A. Kukulska-Hulme & J. Traxler (Eds), Mobile Learning: A Handbook for Educators and Trainers. London: Routledge.
• Levy, M. (1997). CALL: Context and Conceptualisation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Little, D. (1997). Responding authentically to authentic texts: A problem for self-access language learning? In P. Benson & P. Volley (Eds), Autonomy and Independence in Language Learning (pp. 225–236). London: Longman.
• McCarty, S. (2005). Spoken Internet to Go: Popularization through Podcasting. JALT CALL Journal, 1(2), 67–74.
• McKenzie, J. (1993) Barriers to New Technology, Part One: Staff Balkanization. From Now on. The Educational Technology Journal, 4, 1. Available http://fromnowon.org/FNOFeb93.html.
• Oxford, R. (1990). Language Learning Strategies: What Every Teacher Should Know. New York: Newbury House.
• Passey, D. and Samways, B. (1997). Information Technology – Supporting Change Through Teacher Education, Chapman and Hall, UK.
• Porter, J.D. (1993). An Investigation of Secondary Teacher Motivation Orientation and the Attitudes About Extrinsic Incentives (Teacher Motivation), Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, The University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
• Ryan, S.M. (1997). Preparing Learners for Independence: Resources Beyond the Classroom. In P. Benson & P. Volley (Eds), Autonomy and Independence in Language Learning (pp. 215–224). London: Longman.
• Scinicariello, S. (2006). Podcasts in the Language Curriculum: integrating language, content, and technology. Paper presented at the EuroCALL 2006 conference: ‘‘Integrating CALL into Study Programmes’’, 4–7 September 2006, University of Granada, Spain.
• C. and Clark, R. (1990). Motivation and Organizational Incentives for High Vitality Teachers: A Qualitative Perspective, Journal of Research and Development in Education, 24, 13.
• Skehan, P. (2003). Focus on Form, Tasks, and Technology. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 16(5), 391–411.
• Siemenska-Lasko, A. (2006). Barriers Limiting the Initiation and the Usage of Information Technology by Teachers in School, The New Educational Review. Vol. 10, pp. 257–268.
• Stallard, C. (1998). Factors that influence the integration of technology into the secondary curriculum.Available:http://ed.info.apple.com/education/techlearn/ adapt/adaptfactors.html.
• Wiley, D. (2000). Connecting learning objects to instructional design theory: A definition, a metaphor, and a taxonomy. In D. Wiley (Ed.), The instructional use of learning objects. Bloomington: Association for Educational Communications and Technology. Retrieved June 15th, 2006 from http://www.reusability.org/read/ chapters/wiley