A Comparison of EFL Elementary School Learners’ Vocabulary Efficiency by Using Flashcards and Augmented Reality in Taiwan

With the rapid development of Augmented Reality (AR), an increasing number of studies has been conducted to explore the effectiveness of this technology in the field of education. Few, however, have examined how AR might influence EFL (English as a Foreign Language) learners’ vocabulary learning efficiency. To fill in this gap in the literature, the purpose of this study is to compare traditional English flash cards with the vocabulary learning method of Augmented Reality to see which English vocabulary learning is more efficient for elementary school students. The study was conducted at an elementary school in Taiwan, and the participants were 66 third grade pupils in total. The study was conducted at two stages in terms of data collection. At the first stage, the control and experimental groups took the same English vocabulary test without any teacher instruction as a pretest. At the second stage, the control group used flashcards to learn 20 target English words by themselves in 30 minutes. The experimental group adopted the Augmented Reality 3D effect of 20 target words by themselves in 30 minutes. After that, both groups took the same English vocabulary test again as a posttest. On the whole, Augmented Reality teaching effects apparently excel the effects of the traditional vocabulary learning methods. The results of this study have shown that the learning method of Augmented Reality was more efficient than the learning method using English flash cards at various proficiency levels (high, intermediate, and low) in terms of English vocabulary learning. The learning method of English flash cards had significant differences in high and low level groups as well as intermediate and low level groups, with the exceptions of high and intermediate level groups. It is worth improving children’s English vocabulary learning by using Augmented Reality in their daily lives in terms of mobile learning. 

Akbulut, Y. (2007). Effects of multimedia annotations on incidental vocabulary and reading comprehension of advanced learners of English as a foreign language, Instructional Science, 35, 499-517.
Arikan, A., & Taraf, H. (2010). Contextualizing young learners’ English lessons with cartoons: focus on grammar and vocabulary. Educational Leadership, 1 (12), 5212-5215.
Bordbar, F. (2010). English teachers’ attitudes toward computer-assisted language learning. International ]ournal of Language Studies, 4, 27-54.
Carmigniani, ]., Furht, B., Anisetti, M., Ceravolo, P.,Damiani, E., & Ivkovic, ,M. (2010). Augmented reality technologies, systems and applications, Multimedia Tools and Applications, 51(1), 341-377. doi:10.1007/Sl1042-010-0660-6
Chen, C.M., & Hsu, S.H. (2008). Personalized intelligent mobile learning system for supporting effective English learning. Educational Technology é Society, 13 (3), 153- 180.
Godwin, ].R. (2011). Emerging technologies mobile apps for language learning. Language Learning @ Technology, 15(2), 2-11.
Huang, T.C. (2009). Applying Augmented Reality to the Teaching of English Nouns, Verbs, and Adjectives (master’s thesis), Graduate Institute of e-Learning, National Changhua University of Education.
ee, M.]. (2011). Web 2.0 technology needs mobile assisted language learning. The IALLTournal of Language Learning Technologies, 41 ( 1 ), 161 - 175.
Joseph, S., & Uther, M. (2009). Mobile devices for language learning: Multimedia approaches. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 4 (1 ), 7-32.
Hew, K.F., & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: Current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55, 223-252.
Koyooglu, M., & Akbas, R. (2011). A small scale experimental study: using animations to learn vocabulary. The Turkish Online ]ournal of Educational Technology, 10(2), 15-30.
Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Shield, L. (2008). Overview of mobile assisted language learning: Can mobile devices support collaborative practice in speaking and listening? RECALL, 20(3), 271-289.
Lin, PC. (2009). A study of augmented reality on language teaching - A case study of elementary English teaching (master’s thesis), Graduate Institute of e-Learning, National Changhua University of Education.
Perry, B. (2015). Gamifying French language learning: A case study examining a questbased, augmented reality mobile learning-tool. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 2308-2315.
Roca, LC., & Gagne, M. (2008). Understanding e-learning continuance intention in the workplace: A self-determination theory perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(4), 1585-1604.
Rose, F.]., & Bhuvaneswari, R. (2014). Word recognition incorporating augmented reality for linguistic e-conversion. Educational Media International, 51 (1), 1- 15.
Santos, M.E., Chen, A., Taketomi, T., Yamamoto, G., Miyazaki, ]., Kato, H. (2016). Augmented reality learning experiences: Survey of prototype design and evaluation. IEEI Transactions on Learning Technologies, 7(1), 38-56.
Sole, R.C., Calic, I., & Neijmann, D. (2010). A social and self-reflective approach to MALL. ReCALL, 22, 39-52.
Van Krevelen, D.W.F., & Johnson, E. (2010). A survey of augmented reality technologies, applications and limitations. International [ournal of Virtual Reality, 9(2), 1.
Yuen, S., Yaoyuneyong, G., & Johnson, E. (2011). Augmented Reality: An overview and five directions for AR in education. [ournal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 4(1), 119- 140.