Cognitive states in the process of students’ intellectual activity

Author: Alexander O. Prokhorov
Author: Mark G. Yusupov
Author: Viktor V. Plokhikh
Year of publication: 2015
Source: Show
Pages: 263-274
DOI Address:
PDF: tner/201503/tner20150321.pdf

Cognitive states are typical of students’ educational activity, which is accompanied by high activity of cognitive processes. Management of this activity is impossible without the knowledge of the structure, function, and mechanisms of actualization of cognitive states in various learning situations. The research relevance of the problem of cognitive states in the context of students’ intellectual activity is due to their unique role in the regulation of the thinking process, maintaining a  steady focus on the solution of the problem within a certain period of time. The purpose of this article is to study the structure of the cognitive states that arises in the process of solving intellectual problems (through the example of carrying out R. Amthauer’s intelligence structure test). Leading methods to the study of this problem were tests with standardized questionnaires and retrospective self–reports. According to the results of factor analysis, ten key factors underlying the structure of the typical cognitive state of interest/mental stress have been identified. A system–forming factor of this condition has been emphasized, which is an “attitude” to intellectual activity in the context of the overall semantic orientation of the subject. The obtained results can be of interest to researchers in the field of psychology of emotions as well as to specialists involved in the diagnosis of students’ intellectual abilities.


  • Amthauer, R. (1970). Intelligenz–Struktur–Test. I–S–T 70. Gottingen: Hogrefe.
  • Anastasi, A. & Urbina, S. (1997). Psychological Testing (7th ed., p. 721). NJ: Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.
  • Cattell, H.E.P., & Mead, A.D. (2008). The sixteen personality factor questionnaire (16PF). In G. Boyle, G. Matthews, & D.H. Saklofske (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of personality theory and assessment (Vol. 2, Personality measurement and testing, pp. 135-178). Los Angeles, CA Sage.
  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. & Nakamura, J. (2011). Positive psychology: Where did it come from, where is it going? In K.M. Sheldon, T.B. Kashdan, & M.F. Steger (Eds.), Designing positive psychology (pp. 2-9). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Ericsson, K.A. & Simon, H.A. (1980). Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review, 87, 215-251.
  • Eysenck, H.J. & Eysenck, S.B.G. (1975). Manual of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire. London: Hodder and Stoughton.
  • Gabdreeva, G.S. & Yusupov, M.G. (2013). Self–regulation of mental states: psychological technologies and diagnostics. Kazan: Otechestvo.
  • Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence. New York, NY: Bantam Books, Inc.
  • Grant, A.M. (2001). Rethinking Psychological Mindedness: Metacognition, Self–reflection, and Insight. Behavior Change, 18(1), 8-17.
  • Izard, C.E. (1991). The Psychology of Emotions (p. 451). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
  • Leary, T. (1957). Interpersonal Diagnosis of Personality: A functional theory and methodology for personality evaluation. New York, NY: Ronald Press Company.
  • Leontyev, D.A. (2006). Test of life–meaningful orientations (LMO). Psychodiagnostic series. Moscow, M: Smysl.
  • Marcora, S.M., Staiano, W. & Manning, V. (2009). Mental fatigue impairs physical performance in humans. Journal of Applied Physiology, 106(3), 857-864. DOI:10.1152/japplphysiol.91324.2008.
  • Mednick, S.A. & Mednick, M.T. (1967). Examiner’s manual: Remote Associates Test. Boston, MA: Houghton Miffl in.
  • Prokhorov, A.O. & Yusupov, M.G. (2012). Everyday trance state: Phenomenology and regularities. Psikhologicheskii Zhurnal, 33(1), 88-100. ISSN: 02059592.
  • Prokhorov, A.O. & Yusupov, M.G. (2015). Interaction of Mental States and Cognitive Processes in Learning Activity of Students. The Social Sciences, 10, 81-88. DOI: 10.3923/sscience.2015.81.88.
  • Prokhorov, A.O. (1994). Mental states and their functions. Kazan: Kazan State Pedagogical University.
  • Prokhorov, A.O., Chernov, A.V. & Yusupov, M.G. (2015). Cognitive states in educational activity of students: Structural–functional aspect. Asian Social Science, 11(1), 213-218. DOI: 10.5539/ass.v11n1p213.
  • Rotter, J.B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement: Psychological Monographs. General and Applied 80 (1), 1-28.
  • Schraw, G. & Dennison, R.S. (1994). Assessing Metacognitive Awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 460-475. DOI: 10.1006/ceps.1994.1033.
  • Silvia, P.J., Robert, A.H. & Templin, J.L. (2009). Are the sources of interest the same for everyone? Using multilevel mixture models to explore individual differences in appraisal structures. Cognition and Emotion, 23(7), 1389-1406. DOI: 10.1080/026999309 02850528.
  • Thoman, D.B., Smith, J.L. & Silvia, P.J. (2011). The resource replenishment function of interest. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2, 592-599. DOI: 10.1177/1948550 6114025.

intellectual activity cognitive states interest structure

Wiadomość do:



© 2017 Adam Marszałek Publishing House. All rights reserved.

Projekt i wykonanie Pollyart