Business Communication as an Integral Component of Political Discourse in the Internet

Recently, an increasing number of communicative practices are moving to the Internet: the intensity of language use on the Internet is increasing, where a special communicative environment, a special communicative space arises. A special area of research devoted to the study of the linguistics of the Internet is also emerging. Therefore, consideration of the term “Internet communication” should begin with the characteristics of the place in which this type of communication once appeared and is now actively functioning. The Internet is a worldwide system of interconnected computer networks for storing and transmitting information. Often referred to as the World Wide Web and the Global Network, as well as simply the Network. The main areas of use of the Internet are media, e-business, multimedia, communication, communication, etc. This definition primarily emphasizes the technological component of the Network. However, as part of our study, it is worth considering more “humanitarian” definitions. For example, researchers consider the Internet from the point of view of socio-philosophical positions, as a special phenomenon based on network principles of information exchange, “the interactivity of communication interactions, new ways of modeling objective reality, new technologies for transmitting information flows and a fundamentally new technology – personal computers”. Scientists consider the Internet through the prism of the sociology of communications, emphasizing that the Network represents “a man-made, informational and socio-psychoanthropological component of a person’s life context.” According to them, the Internet as a means of social communication reveals such binary properties as “activity / passivity of the social subject of the information world; the fragmentation/harmony of human social existence in the information society and the inconsistency/consistency of the content of social influence in the information world”. Business English, business discourse, and political discourse are interconnected in various ways, primarily because they all involve communication strategies aimed at achieving specific goals within their respective contexts.

 

REFERENCES:

• Antos, G. (2005) Die Rolle der Kommunikation bei der Konzeptualisierung von Wissensbegriffen. In: Antos, G./Wichter, S. (eds.) Wissenstransfer durch Sprache als gesellschaftliches Problem. Frankfurt am Main, Peter Lang, pp. 339–364. [in German].
• Bourdieu, P. (1991) Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge, Polity Press. [in English].
• Candlin, C.N. (2002) Alterity, Perspective and Mutuality in LSP Research and Practice. In: Gotti, M./ Heller, D. & Dossena, M. (eds.) Selected Papers of the 2nd Cerlis Conference. Bern, Peter Lang, pp. 21– 40. [in English].
• De Beaugrande, R./Dressler, W. (1981) Einführung in die Textlinguistik. Tübingen, Max Niemeyer. DOI: 10.1515/9783111349305. [in English].
• De Saint-Georges, I. (2004) Materiality in Discourse: The Influence of Space and Layout in Making Meaning. In: Levine, P./Scollon, R. (eds.) Discourse & Technology – multimodal discourse analysis, Washington, D.C., Georgetown University Press, pp. 71–87. [in English].
• Halliday, M.A.K. (1994) An Introduction to Functional Grammar, London, Edward Arnold. DOI: 10.432 4/9780203783771. [in English].
• Halliday, M.A.K./Hasan, R. (1976) Cohesion in English. London, Longman. DOI: 10.4324/9781315 836010. [in English].
• Halliday, M.A.K./Hasan, R. (1985) Language, Context, and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-semiotic Perspective. Geelong, Deakin University Press.
• Hoey, M. (2001) Textual Interaction. An Introduction to Written Discourse Analysis. London, Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203351093. [in English].
• Jahr, S. (2005) Die Effektivierung des Transfers von Wissen durch die Kommunikation von Emotionen in juristischen Texten. In: Antos, G./Wichter, S. (eds.): Wissenstransfer durch Sprache als gesellschaftliches Problem. Frankfurt am Main, Peter Lang, pp. 307–318. [in English]
• Kishchenko N., Morhun I. (2023). Understanding the criteria of wisdom in the context of international relations. HUMANITIES SCIENCE CURRENT ISSUES: Interuniversity collection of Drohobych Ivan Franko State Pedagogical University Young Scientists Research Papers.
• Kress, G./van Leeuwen, T. (1996) Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. London, Routledge. DOI: 10.1075/idjdd.12.2.03kre. [in English].
• Martin, J.R./Rose D. (2004) Working with discourse. Meaning beyond the clause. London/New York, Continuum. [in English].
• Matthiessen, C. (1995) Theme as an enabling resource in ideational ‘knowledge’ construction. In: Mohsen, G. (ed.) Thematic Development in English Texts. London, Francis Pinter, pp. 20–54. [in English].
• Oeckel, A. (1988) Glaubwürdigkeit contra Angst – Kursbestimmung der Öffentlichkeitsarbeit. In: Schulze-Fürstenow, G. (ed.) PR-Perspektiven. Beiträge zum Selbstverständnis gesellschaftsorientierter Öffentlichkeitsarbeit (PR), Neuwied/Darmstadt, Luchterhand Verlag, pp. 13–26. [in English].
• Poynton, C. (1985) Language and Gender: Making the Difference. Geelong, Deakin University Press. [in English].
• Ronneberger, F. (1978) Public Relations in politischen Systemen. In: Ronneberger, F. (ed.) Public Relations des politischen Systems. Staat, Kommunen und Verbände, Nürnberger Forschungsbericht Band 2. Nürnberg, Verlag der Nürnberger Forschungsvereinigung, pp. 1–21. [in English].